Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Meeting order #380

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

Meeting order #380

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

sajdakabir
Copy link
Member

@sajdakabir sajdakabir commented Oct 23, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced integration with Google Calendar, allowing for better tracking of meeting sources.
  • Improvements
    • Updated sorting criteria for retrieving meetings, now prioritizing start date and time for a more logical meeting order.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Maintained existing functionality for error handling in meeting deletion.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to two service files: calendar.service.js and meeting.service.js. In calendar.service.js, the handling of Google Calendar events has been refined, particularly with the addition of a source property when creating meeting instances and the removal of the description field from the metadata object. In meeting.service.js, the sorting criteria for retrieving meetings has been modified to prioritize the metadata.start.dateTime and metadata.start fields in ascending order, replacing previous sorting methods.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/backend/src/services/integration/calendar.service.js Updated saveUpcomingMeetingsToDatabase and handleCalendarWebhookService to include a source property set to 'calendar'; removed description field from metadata.
apps/backend/src/services/page/meeting.service.js Modified getMeeting and recentUpcomingMeeting functions to sort meetings by metadata.start.dateTime and metadata.start in ascending order.

Possibly related PRs

  • Meeting order #380: The changes in this PR directly mirror the modifications made to the calendar.service.js file in the main PR, specifically regarding the addition of the source property and the removal of the description field in the metadata object for the same functions.

Poem

🐇 In the garden where meetings bloom,
A source now whispers, dispelling gloom.
With dates aligned in a tidy row,
Our calendar dances, watch it flow!
A hop, a skip, to the future we leap,
In this world of time, our secrets we keep. 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/backend/src/services/page/meeting.service.js (3)

Line range hint 16-16: Fix inconsistent field path usage.

The function uses metadata.start.dateTime for filtering but metadata.start for sorting. This inconsistency could lead to unexpected behavior.

Apply this fix to maintain consistency:

-    .sort({ 'metadata.start': 1 })
+    .sort({ 'metadata.start.dateTime': 1 })

Line range hint 24-28: Remove unnecessary sorting in getMeetingById.

Since the function fetches a specific meeting by ID, the sorting by created_at is unnecessary and can be removed as it won't affect the result.

const getMeetingById = async (user, id) => {
    const meeting = await Meeting.find({
        user,
        _id: id
-    })
-        .sort({ created_at: -1 });
+    });

    return meeting;
};

Line range hint 31-36: Consider adding sorting to getUpcomingMeetings.

For consistency with other functions, consider sorting upcoming meetings by start time as well.

const getUpcomingMeetings = async (user, currentDateTime) => {
    const upcomingMeetings = await Meeting.find({
        user,
        'metadata.start.dateTime': { $gt: currentDateTime.toISOString() }
-    });
+    })
+        .sort({ 'metadata.start.dateTime': 1 });
    return upcomingMeetings;
};
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a3ad8d4 and fb42d13.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/backend/src/services/integration/calendar.service.js (2 hunks)
  • apps/backend/src/services/page/meeting.service.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/backend/src/services/page/meeting.service.js (1)

7-7: Verify field existence and consider adding an index.

While sorting by meeting start time is more logical than creation time, we should ensure:

  1. All meeting documents have the metadata.start.dateTime field
  2. An index exists for efficient sorting

Consider adding a compound index if one doesn't exist:

// In your schema or index creation script
{ "metadata.start.dateTime": 1, "user": 1 }
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the Meeting schema and any index definitions to make a more informed decision.


Let me try one more search to find the schema definition with a corrected regex:


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:

The sorting by metadata.start.dateTime is safe to use

The schema definition shows that metadata is defined as Schema.Types.Mixed, which is a flexible type that allows any structure. The field is being used consistently across multiple queries in the service:

  • For sorting: .sort({ 'metadata.start.dateTime': 1 })
  • For filtering upcoming meetings: 'metadata.start.dateTime': { $gte: now }
  • For filtering future meetings: 'metadata.start.dateTime': { $gt: currentDateTime.toISOString() }

While an index would improve performance, the consistent usage pattern across the service indicates this is a well-established field in the meeting documents.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential missing fields and index existence

# Test 1: Check if all documents have the required field
ast-grep --pattern 'new Meeting({
  $$$
  metadata: {
    $$$
    start: {
      dateTime: $_
    }
    $$$
  }
  $$$
})'

# Test 2: Look for index definition
rg -l "metadata.start.dateTime" --type js

Length of output: 215


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Meeting schema definition and index configurations
rg -A 10 "const meetingSchema = new Schema\({" --type js

# Look for any index definitions related to metadata or meetings
rg "createIndex|index: true" --type js

# Check all usages of metadata.start.dateTime to understand the context
rg "metadata\.start\.dateTime" -A 2 --type js

Length of output: 1014


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Meeting schema definition with corrected pattern
rg -A 15 "const.*Schema.*=" --type js

# Also check for any mongoose model definitions
rg -A 5 "mongoose.model.*Meeting" --type js

Length of output: 9184

apps/backend/src/services/integration/calendar.service.js (1)

Line range hint 218-319: Verify consistent meeting data handling across the system.

The changes introduce potential inconsistencies in meeting data structure that should be verified:

  1. Ensure frontend components handle both metadata structures correctly
  2. Verify that any queries or filters using the 'source' field account for both spellings
  3. Check if existing meetings in the database need migration

@@ -303,6 +302,7 @@ const handleCalendarWebhookService = async (accessToken, refreshToken, userId) =
// Create new meeting
const newMeeting = new Meeting({
title: event.summary,
source: 'calender',
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix spelling error in source value.

The source value contains the same spelling error as before: 'calender' should be 'calendar'.

-    source: 'calender',
+    source: 'calendar',
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
source: 'calender',
source: 'calendar',

@@ -215,11 +215,11 @@ const saveUpcomingMeetingsToDatabase = async (meetings, userId) => {
if (!existingMeeting) {
const newMeeting = new Meeting({
title: meeting.summary,
source: 'calender',
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix spelling error in source value.

The source value contains a spelling error: 'calender' should be 'calendar'.

-    source: 'calender',
+    source: 'calendar',
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
source: 'calender',
source: 'calendar',

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant