-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 149
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move Size
to StaticArraysCore.jl
#1094
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be moved to StaticArraysCore as well? Technically it is type piracy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are some additional definitions below with types from base.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
StaticArraysCore
currently doesn't importLinearAlgebra
so that's why I didn't more them. Is there a use for these methods inStaticArraysCore
withoutStaticArrays
?I know this is type piracy but it should be harmless since
StaticArrays
in practice "owns"Size
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's why I assumed it is mostly technical. It would only become an issue if some other package wants to use these
Size
functionalities without depending on StaticArrays itself.Some of the definitions below don't even use LinearAlgebra (or some other standard library), e.g.,
Base.prod
or definitions forTuple
s.Generally, I would assume that it's fine for StaticArraysCore to depend on LinearAlgebra as it is a standard library and I think usually any package with StaticArraysCore in the dependency tree will have LinearAlgebra in the dependency tree anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since the PR to core is already merged and tagged, let's leave that to a new PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Basically all of StaticArrays is type piracy, e.g.
*(::SMatrix, ::SVector)
is type piracy since StaticArrays owns neither the function nor the types.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this might actually not only be a theoretical problem but cause issues with generated functions: JuliaDiff/ForwardDiff.jl#599 (comment)