Add option historyApiFallback #922
Conversation
drudrum
requested review from
alexander-akait,
hiroppy and
snitin315
as code owners
|
I want use react router5 in my app. i want add option like as |
|
You can do it on own side, why we need add it here? |
|
Many people want to see compatibility with webpack-dev-server options (i think). No additional dependencies required. Small useful change. |
|
Please provide example of the problem, because you can use |
|
|
|
Can you create simple git repo? I think I understand the problem, but I would like to check this before merge? Thanks |
|
Readme at 59382db |
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #922 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 97.34% 97.38% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 9 9
Lines 377 382 +5
Branches 112 116 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 367 372 +5
Misses 9 9
Partials 1 1
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
How i can fix it? |
|
Please rebase, should work |
|
Workflow dislike me )) |
types/utils/setupWriteToDisk.d.ts
Outdated
| type MultiCompiler = import('webpack').MultiCompiler; | ||
| type Compilation = import('webpack').Compilation; | ||
| type IncomingMessage = import('../index.js').IncomingMessage; | ||
| type ServerResponse = import('../index.js').ServerResponse; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like we need to run prettier on all types files, can you do it?
|
@drudrum Friendly ping |
|
@alexander-akait Sorry. We should finish this old PR :-) |
|
@alexander-akait Can you find approvers for this PR? |
| !context.outputFileSystem.existsSync(filename) && | ||
| options.historyApiFallback | ||
| ) { | ||
| filename = path.join(outputPath); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why do we need path.join here, it doesn't have sense
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I will check. Look like mistake. May be we need change it to path.resolve
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Now this code looks like this option is not necessarily at all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Everything should work without this option.
I am confused.
I feel that i need cancel this PR.
|
This is duplicated PR. We have the same #930 |
This PR contains a:
Motivation / Use-Case
Adds support of history api (Example: React Router5)
Like this https://webpack.js.org/configuration/dev-server/#devserverhistoryapifallback
Breaking Changes
Additional Info