status | title | creation-date | last-updated | authors | collaborators | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
implemented |
CEL in WhenExpression |
2023-09-21 |
2023-10-22 |
|
This TEP proposes to add CEL (Common Expression Language) support in when
expressions to enable more powerful conditional execution and improve the user experience by offering a more concise way of defining conditionals.
CEL is a non-Turing complete language designed for simplicity, speed, safety, and portability. Tekton has adopted CEL expressions in Trigger to match specific events to trigger PipelineRuns, and CELCustomRun is implemented to experiment with CEL in Tekton Pipelines without adding CEL directly to the Tekton API.
There are several feature requests in the community which can be met if CEL is supported in Tekton Pipeline:
- #3591 calls for supporting ANY match behaviour in
WhenExpressions
to execute the task if anyparams
is not empty. - #3149 suggests using CEL to split the string instead of adding an additional task to do the work.
Take a look at current WhenExpressions:
when:
- input: "$(params.path)"
operator: in
values: ["README.md"]
Current WhenExpression
requires users to define three fields: input
, operator
and values
. but CEL expressions can achieve the same functionality with a single string. Additionally, the current operator only supports in
and notin
, which can be limiting for complex use cases. For example, users will need to figure out hacky workarounds to support any in their case.
For these reasons, WhenExpressions
would be a good place to start introducing CEL in Tekton Pipelines. This would allow users to write more concise and powerful conditional expressions, and it could be extended to other fields in the future.
- Cover all the functionalities of current
WhenExpression
and offer a simpler way of having the conditional execution - Support ANY: e.g. Execute the task with if any params is not empty
- Support numeric operators such as GreaterThan/LessThan, e.g. Execute the task if test coverage is large than a certain number.
- Support CEL in
WhenExpression
.
- Support CEL in Pipeline API fields other than
WhenExpression
.
- The syntax should be extensible to support other expression languages in the future if needed.
- The pipeline authors cannot inject an entire CEL expression using a variable such as params or results i.e. CEL expression can include params and results which will be resolved but params and results cannot hold an entire valid CEL expression. This requirement is imposed due to a security concern as described in TEP-0146.
- The CEL should support string variable substitutions of params, results and context, the results substitution would thus help to build graph dependency of Tasks.
Similar expression evaluations are supported in other CI/CD tools in the industry:
- Argo:
Workflows
support conditional execution using a when property to specify whether to run or skip aStep
(example). - GitHub Actions: supports evaluating expressions in
if
of astep
to enable conditional execution. - Jenkins: executes the stage when the specified Groovy expression evaluates to true.
- Spinnaker: Uses string expressions,
Stages
only run when expressions evaluate toTrue
.
This doc proposes to add a string
type field cel
under WhenExpression
. Like CelCustomRun, we propose to use cel-go for the expression evaluation. This will allow users to craft any valid CEL expression as defined by the cel-spec language definition.
In this section we will show how CEL can support the use cases.
# current WhenWxpressions
when:
- input: "foo"
operator: "in"
values: ["foo", "bar"]
- input: "duh"
operator: "notin"
values: ["foo", "bar"]
# with cel
when:
- cel: "'foo' in ['foo', 'bar']"
- cel: "'duh' not in ['foo', 'bar']"
Note: The WhenExpressions
contains a list of WhenExpression
, if all WhenExpressions
are true it will return true and allow execution. So we’re using AND to evaluate the list of WhenExpressions
. And this will remain the same for this proposal as we propose to add a subfield CEL
under WhenExpression
and each existing WhenExpression
can be replaced with a CEL expression.
Note that multiple WhenExpressions could be merged into 1 CEL
, users can use &&
or ||
operator to connect different expressions so we can overcome the limitations of current WhenExpressions
: (1) limited by a single operator (in or notin) for any given expression and (2) the list of expressions are evaluated using and operator.
This is the workaround from #3591,
whenAny:
- input: "$(params.param1)"
operator: notin
values: [""]
- input: "$(params.param2)"
operator: in
values: ["8.5", "8.6"]
With CEL we can use a more intuitive expression to support it.
when:
cel: "$(params.param1) != '' || $(params.param2) == '8.5' || $(params.param2) == '8.6'"
This is not possible with current WhenExpression
. With CEL we can do:
when:
- cel: "$(tasks.unit-test.results.test-coverage) >= 0.9"
Note: currently there are no automatic arithmetic conversions for the numeric types (int, uint, and double), so the emitted results must be the same numeric type to make sure the evaluation works.
This is not possible with current WhenExpression
. With CEL we can do:
when:
- cel: "$(params.branch).matches('release/.*')"
The CEL in When Expressions should support current Tekton’s Params and Results string substitutions and whole Array and object substitutions are not supported.
We should support Tekton’s variable substitution for 2 reasons:
- This is consistent with all other variable substitution syntax in Tekton, and thus more intuitive for Tekton users;
- This would help to build the dag of Pipeline Tasks, as tasks in a pipeline will check the result reference and build the dependency between Tasks.
We cannot use the current Tekton's variable substitution directly. Because the current variables substitution has the the similar security concern as TEP-0146, for example, users can inject a CEL expression from the Param
and it could alter the result of the CEL which referenced that Param
in WhenExpression
, or execute a CEL which consume more resources than expected.
To address this, we need to:
- Prevent the attack by adding sanity check;
- Explicitly document that passing CEL expression from param is not allowed and won’t be executed.
The solution we proposed is to let CEL handle the variable substitution:
- Add params, results, context variables to CEL's environment, similar like Tekton Triggers
- Find all variable references in the CEL expression string and remove the '$()' from those references.
- CEL would do the replacement with 1 and 2 with built-in variable substitution
The new fields will be gated by cel-in-whenexpression
, which will default to false while the feature is in alpha.
The validation webhook will validate
- The feature flag is enabled
- If the flag is enabled, either the current when input+operator+values or cel is used, users cannot use both at the same time for one WhenExpression, but they can use different syntax for different WhenExpressions. Backward compatibility is maintained since users can still use existing syntax
- If the CEL expression is valid.
This is an E2E example:
apiVersion: tekton.dev/v1
kind: PipelineRun
metadata:
generateName: guarded-pr-
spec:
pipelineSpec:
params:
- name: path
type: string
description: The path of the file to be created
- name: branches
type: array
description: The list of branch names
workspaces:
- name: source
description: |
This workspace is shared among all the pipeline tasks to read/write common resources
tasks:
- name: create-file
when:
- cel: "$(params.path) == 'README.md'"
workspaces:
- name: source
workspace: source
taskSpec:
workspaces:
- name: source
description: The workspace to create the readme file in
steps:
- name: write-new-stuff
image: ubuntu
script: 'touch $(workspaces.source.path)/README.md'
- name: check-file
params:
- name: path
value: "$(params.path)"
workspaces:
- name: source
workspace: source
runAfter:
- create-file
taskSpec:
params:
- name: path
workspaces:
- name: source
description: The workspace to check for the file
results:
- name: exists
description: indicates whether the file exists or is missing
steps:
- name: check-file
image: alpine
script: |
if test -f $(workspaces.source.path)/$(params.path); then
printf yes | tee $(results.exists.path)
else
printf no | tee $(results.exists.path)
fi
- name: echo-file-exists
when:
- cel: "$(tasks.check-file.results.exists) in ['yes']"
taskSpec:
steps:
- name: echo
image: ubuntu
script: 'echo file exists'
finally:
- name: finally-task-should-be-executed
when:
- cel: "$(tasks.echo-file-exists.status) == 'Succeeded'"
- cel: "$(tasks.status) == 'Succeeded'"
- cel: "$(tasks.check-file.results.exists) == 'yes'"
- cel: "$(params.path) == 'README.md'"
taskSpec:
steps:
- name: echo
image: ubuntu
script: 'echo finally done'
params:
- name: path
value: README.md
- name: branches
value:
- main
- hotfix
workspaces:
- name: source
volumeClaimTemplate:
spec:
accessModes:
- ReadWriteOnce
resources:
requests:
storage: 16Mi
The proposal helps to reduce the verbosity in Tekton by using 1 string of CEL expression instead of 3 (input+operator+values).
CEL is a powerful expression language that can be used to perform a wide variety of tasks in CI/CD pipelines. This increases the flexibility of WhenExpression
in Tekton to handle more complex conditions.
The proposal will introduce an additive change to the current API. It does not impact conformance in the inital release.
This proposal should help to improve the user experience by
- simplifying the syntax for
WhenExpression
- support more complex conditional execution instead of hacky workaround
Users need to be familar with CEL expression syntax to use it properly, this may be a learning curve but they can choose to use current WhenExpression
syntax for simple cases.
Tekton can support more operators from k8s apimachinery in WhenExpression
's Operator
.
CEL has been adopted in Tekton Triggers and CustomTask. We could add it first and consider other languages support as future work.
Add CEL
to WhenExpression
:
type WhenExpression struct {
// Input is the string for guard checking which can be a static input or an output from a parent Task
Input string `json:"input"`
// Operator that represents an Input's relationship to the values
Operator selection.Operator `json:"operator"`
// Values is an array of strings, which is compared against the input, for guard checking
// It must be non-empty
// +listType=atomic
Values []string `json:"values"`
// CEL is a CEL expression to evaluate, if follows the cel-spec language definition
CEL string `json:"cel",omitempty`
}
This feature will be introduced in alpha with a dedicated feature flag which is disabled by default.
When the feature is promoted to beta, the dedicated feature flag will be enabled by default.
When the feature is promoted to stable, the dedicated feature flag will be removed and the feature will be available by default.
The work is tracked by tektoncd/pipeline#7244: