August 31 2020 Community Meeting

[adambkaplan]

• Please add a topic in this thread and add a link to the Github issue associated with the topic.\
• Please make sure you give folks enough time to review/discuss the topic offline on Github before coming into the meeting :)
• (optional) Paste the image of an animal :)

[zhangtbj]

• Performance tuning summary

[adambkaplan]

• Governance roles
  • Infrastructure ownership (Github, quay, etc.)
  • Code of Conduct reporting

[qu1queee]

• Integration tests setup Add integration-test in the Build #322 (based on latest meeting feedback)

[SaschaSchwarze0]

• Organizing samples #366
• Reduce prometheus metric count #367
• Build controller handling of service account can lead to failing build runs and other artifacts #337 - conclusion from discussion is to change the default behavior if service account section is missing from using the pipeline/default service account to using a generated one. Any objections?

[adambkaplan]

Update on copyright: #336

[zhangtbj]

The first release note: #357 (comment)

[qu1queee]

Action Items:

• Based on the performance we ran from our side, we should document most of the key findings in github. This should include:

  • bottlenecks we find and how to address them
  • dependencies to tekton etc, and issues we open to them

• Probably have more sessions on how we run performance tests and what could we donate/share to the open-source.

• We might like to run performance tests in shipwright at some point, this will imply to have robust infrastructure. @qu1queee might have a future proposal for this.

• Presenting Build and the Build performance findings in the Tekton community sessions.

• @adambkaplan to provide a PR for the copyright text we need to have in the source code.

• we discuss on the importance on deciding governance roles and layout the code of conduct.

• we discuss on getting more feedback in Organize samples #366 and Build controller handling of service account can lead to failing build runs and other artifacts #337

• we discuss on prometheus metrics and if we are fine to remove some namespace labels in the current metrics, see Reduce prometheus metric count #367

[adambkaplan]

/close

[openshift-ci-robot]

@adambkaplan: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.