Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

llvm: Ignore error value that is always false #135177

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

maurer
Copy link
Contributor

@maurer maurer commented Jan 7, 2025

See llvm/llvm-project#121851

For LLVM 20+, this function (renameModuleForThinLTO) has no return value. For prior versions of LLVM, this never failed, but had a signature which allowed an error value people were handling.

@rustbot label: +llvm-main
r? @nikic

Wait a moment before approving while the llvm-main infrastructure picks it up.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 7, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 7, 2025

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc

cc @antoyo, @GuillaumeGomez

@rustbot rustbot added the llvm-main Marks PRs that are making Rust work with LLVM main (this label is consumed by CI tooling) label Jan 7, 2025
See llvm/llvm-project#121851

For LLVM 20+, this function (`renameModuleForThinLTO`) has no return
value. For prior versions of LLVM, this never failed, but had a
signature which allowed an error value people were handling.
@maurer
Copy link
Contributor Author

maurer commented Jan 7, 2025

Failure

Passing

@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Jan 7, 2025

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 7, 2025

📌 Commit fc32dd4 has been approved by nikic

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 7, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2025
…llaumeGomez

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135081 (bootstrap: Build jemalloc with support for 64K pages)
 - rust-lang#135174 ([AIX] Port test case run-make/reproducible-build )
 - rust-lang#135177 (llvm: Ignore error value that is always false)
 - rust-lang#135182 (Transmute from NonNull to pointer when elaborating a box deref (MCP807))
 - rust-lang#135187 (apply a workaround fix for the release roadblock)
 - rust-lang#135189 (Remove workaround from pull request template)
 - rust-lang#135193 (don't bless `proc_macro_deps.rs` unless it's necessary)
 - rust-lang#135198 (Avoid naming variables `str`)
 - rust-lang#135199 (Eliminate an unnecessary `Symbol::to_string`; use `as_str`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 020d875 into rust-lang:master Jan 7, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.86.0 milestone Jan 7, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#135177 - maurer:rename-module, r=nikic

llvm: Ignore error value that is always false

See llvm/llvm-project#121851

For LLVM 20+, this function (`renameModuleForThinLTO`) has no return value. For prior versions of LLVM, this never failed, but had a signature which allowed an error value people were handling.

`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
r? `@nikic`

Wait a moment before approving while the llvm-main infrastructure picks it up.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
llvm-main Marks PRs that are making Rust work with LLVM main (this label is consumed by CI tooling) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants