Support for Oneof in proto files

[lpabon]

Also included a template to generate markdown from grpc proto spec

Signed-off-by: Luis Pabón [email protected]

[jason-fox]

If this is a more up-to-date protokit compatible 1.1.0 compatible solution to fix the issue #333 I personally would love to see oneOf added.

I raised PR #336 for this problem back in January, and I have been awaiting feedback ever since. I have changed jobs in the last six months, and would no longer have time to commit to making further updates in Go to move my own PR forward, so assuming you are more active in the area I would like to see this effort move to a successful conclusion.

Does this also create a oneOf description from the comments as well as a flag? Do the templates need updating? Is there anything else you could amalgamate from my effort?

[Globegitter]

@pseudomuto anything blocking this from getting merged? Is it not compatible anymore with the latest version?

[nicolassleiman]

Any update?

[guiguan]

Yes, please merge this one

[nielsvaneck]

@pseudomuto could this be merged & released?

[ping-localhost]

Can we please get this merged @pseudomuto. Anything I can do to help?

[ping-localhost]

Pinging @pseudomuto again. Anything I/we can do to help?

[pseudomuto]

At a glance this LGTM 👍 At this point it'll need a rebase

[ping-localhost]

At a glance this LGTM 👍 At this point it'll need a rebase

Any chance you're able to do so @pseudomuto / @lpabon. Otherwise I'll take a crack at it :)

[fhalim]

Submitted #436 to rebase this PR against current master.

[lpabon]

Hey guys! Just noticed this 4 years later now that I'm back on this again 😄 . Thank you so much for merging!