docs: Update PR template #2731
Merged
docs: Update PR template #2731
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jonaharagon
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 23, 2024
jonaharagon
force-pushed
the
remove-pr-cla
branch
from
08b8bd0 to
79b3675
Compare
✅ Your preview is ready!
|
dngray
approved these changes
Aug 25, 2024
dngray
approved these changes
Aug 25, 2024
Signed-off-by: blacklight447 <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gray <[email protected]>
dngray
approved these changes
Aug 25, 2024
|
This pull request has been mentioned on Privacy Guides. There might be relevant details there: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes proposed in this PR:
This was really only necessary if we ever desired to relicense the site in the future. I was concerned about this back when the site was licensed CC BY-ND. However, I think we should just commit fully to our current license, and eliminate any temptation to keep messing with licenses, we've switched things around enough as-is.
I will note that this would also remove the potential for us to switch to a less restrictive license, like CC BY or even back to CC0 again. It's my understanding that nobody here desires to do so though.