-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Networking: Add user defined networks EgressIP tests #29420
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
For layer 2 and layer 3 primary user defined networks. Signed-off-by: Martin Kennelly <[email protected]>
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview |
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-techpreview /payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6-techpreview |
@martinkennelly: trigger 2 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/bb3525d0-cf3a-11ef-94e5-3e744d8b3b00-0 |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: martinkennelly The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
g.Entry("[OCPFeatureGate:NetworkSegmentation][Feature:UserDefinedPrimaryNetworks]", networkAttachmentConfigParams{name: "l3udn", topology: "layer3", role: "primary", cidr: correctCIDRFamily(newPrivilegedEIPOC(), "30.10.0.0/16", "2014:100:200::0/60")}), | ||
g.Entry("[OCPFeatureGate:NetworkSegmentation][Feature:UserDefinedPrimaryNetworks]", networkAttachmentConfigParams{name: "l2udn", topology: "layer2", role: "primary", cidr: correctCIDRFamily(newPrivilegedEIPOC(), "30.10.0.0/16", "2014:100:200::0/60")})) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks to me that these should be skipped for MicroShift. It does not have a networks.operator.openshift.io
so GetIPAddressFamily()
fails.
@pacevedom correct me if I'm wrong
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Am I right assuming that g.DescribeTableSubtree
will execute code for creating the entries before the test themselves, and these entries are executing correctCIDRFamily
, that now panics instead of returning an error?
The behavior I see in microshift jobs seems to go this way but I would like to confirm.
We do not have some of the apigroups you would expect in that function in microshift, and this code is executed before the automatic skipping based on feature gates, etc.
For layer 3 and layer 2 primary user defined networks.