add possible missing 0x prefix on agreementId #777
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
paulo-ocean
requested review from
alexcos20,
bogdanfazakas,
jamiehewitt15 and
mariacarmina
as code owners
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #776
Changes proposed in this PR:
On the GetComputeStatus endpoint call from the CLI..
computeStatusremoves the '0x' prefix on theagreementIdfield (not sure why it was done like that in the first place). But this causes a mismatch on the string, whenever that field is used on the query.(we might need to update also the SDK if that is a bug there)