We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LLMService
Improvement
Low (would be nice)
All of the docstrings in the LLMService and derived classes do not document the return types.
Add return types for classes derived from LLMService and LLMClient. Return type annotations should be in the numpydoc format. i.e.
LLMClient
Returns ------- str _description_
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Add function return documentation for LLMService (#1721)
3360602
- Changes to add return types for classes derived from in LLMService and LLMClient (llm_service.py) "fixes #1720 " ## By Submitting this PR I confirm: - I am familiar with the [Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/nv-morpheus/Morpheus/blob/main/docs/source/developer_guide/contributing.md). - When the PR is ready for review, new or existing tests cover these changes. - When the PR is ready for review, the documentation is up to date with these changes. Authors: - https://github.com/acaklovic-nv Approvers: - Michael Demoret (https://github.com/mdemoret-nv) URL: #1721
acaklovic-nv
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Is this a new feature, an improvement, or a change to existing functionality?
Improvement
How would you describe the priority of this feature request
Low (would be nice)
Please provide a clear description of problem this feature solves
All of the docstrings in the
LLMService
and derived classes do not document the return types.Describe your ideal solution
Add return types for classes derived from
LLMService
andLLMClient
. Return type annotations should be in the numpydoc format. i.e.Additional context
No response
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: