Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 21, 2018. It is now read-only.

[el-translation ES6 page] #167

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

[el-translation ES6 page] #167

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

AvraamMavridis
Copy link
Contributor

@AntouanK @therebelrobot The missing ES6 page.


On joyent/[email protected] (V8 3.26), the `--harmony` runtime flag enabled all **completed**, **staged** and **in progress** ES6 features together, in bulk (with the exception of nonstandard/non-harmonious semantics for `typeof` which were hidden under `--harmony-typeof`). This meant that some really buggy or even broken features like [proxies](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Proxy) were just as readily available for developers as [generators](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/function*), which had very little or even no known-issues. As such, it was best practice to either enable only certain features by using specific runtime harmony feature flags (e.g. `--harmony-generators`), or simply enable all of them and then use a restricted subset.
Στην joyent/[email protected] (V8 3.26), με `--harmony` runtime flag ενεργοποιούνται όλες μαζί οι δυνατότητες της ES6 είτε είναι **ολοκληρομένες**, είτε **σε φάση ελέγχου** είτε **υπό ανάπτυξη** (με εξαίρεση τα nonstandard/non-harmonious semantics για το `typeof` τα οποία βρίσκονται υπό το flag `--harmony-typeof`). Αυτό σημαίνει πως κάποια χαρακτηριστικά τα οποία περιέχουν σφάλματα ή δεν λειτουργούν καθόλου, όπως π.χ. [proxies](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Proxy) ήταν διαθέσιμα στους developers μαζί με χαρακτηριστικά τα οποία είχαν λίγα ή καθόλου γνωστά προβλήματα όπως π.χ. οι [generators](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/function*). Ως εκ τούτου, ήταν καλή πρακτική είτε να ενεργοποιείς μόνο συγκεκριμένα χαρακτηριστικά χρησιμοποιώντας συγκεκριμένα runtime harmony flags (π.χ. `--harmony-generators`), είτε να τα ενεργοποιείς όλα τα χαρακτηριστικά και να χρησιμοποιείς μόνο ένα υποσύνολο από αυτά.

This comment was marked as off-topic.


* [Classes](https://github.com/lukehoban/es6features#classes) (strict mode only)
* [Object literal extensions](https://github.com/lukehoban/es6features#enhanced-object-literals)

* [`Symbol.toStringTag`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Symbol) (user-definable results for `Object.prototype.toString`)

## I have my infrastructure set up to leverage the --harmony flag. Should I remove it?
## Έχω ρυθμίση την υποδομή μου με την χρησή του --harmony flag. Πρέπει να το αφαιρέσω;

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@AntouanK
Copy link
Contributor

looks good

@therebelrobot after merging, do you run a build on the production website?
Because at https://iojs.org/el/index.html I can see still the old 1.2.0 english version

@therebelrobot
Copy link
Contributor

I generally run in later in the evening, MST, generally around 03:00 and 04:00 UTC. I want to get in the habit of one compile per day, with special cases for new releases and stuff like that.

@AntouanK
Copy link
Contributor

would you consider having a commit tag or a timestamp in a comment in the index.html code so we can easily see what version is live?

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Seems reasonable.

@therebelrobot
Copy link
Contributor

+1 to that. I'll add it into the build tonight.

@AntouanK
Copy link
Contributor

I use git tags, and then on building with gulp, I add a comment in the html page, with the stdout of the git describe --tags command.
shows the tag version plus the commit.
It's detailed and you can see at any time what's the last commit of the page you are seeing.

I can make a PR later so you can see an example.

@therebelrobot
Copy link
Contributor

The problem is that not everyone uses git tags (read: me). I'd most likely do build time and the latest commit hash, maybe the title of that commit, just to keep it simple

@AntouanK
Copy link
Contributor

@therebelrobot Is there anything pending in order to merge this PR?

Fishrock123 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2015
@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Landed in fd3c050 -- thanks!

@AntouanK
Copy link
Contributor

cool , thanks @Fishrock123

@AntouanK
Copy link
Contributor

@therebelrobot @Fishrock123 Still seeing only the english page at https://iojs.org/el/index.html .
Shouldn't the latest build pick the files we merged?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants