refactor: today scroll #543
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the layout and styling of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Hey there! 👋 We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification. Valid types:
Format: Error details: |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/frontend/src/components/Today/TodayPage.tsx (1)
33-34: Consider dynamic height distribution between sections.Both the text area and items sections are fixed at
30vh, which might not be optimal for content distribution. Consider implementing a more flexible layout that adapts to content size, possibly using:
- CSS Grid with
minmax()- Flexbox with
flex-grow- Dynamic height calculation based on content
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/frontend/src/components/Today/TodayPage.tsx(2 hunks)apps/frontend/src/components/TodayMeetings.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend/src/components/TodayTextArea.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- apps/frontend/src/components/TodayMeetings.tsx
- apps/frontend/src/components/TodayTextArea.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/frontend/src/components/Today/TodayPage.tsx (3)
30-32: Consider making the height constraint configurable.
The fixed height of 30vh might not be optimal for all screen sizes. Consider:
- Making this value configurable through a prop
- Using CSS variables for better maintainability
- Implementing responsive height adjustments
Also, ensure the no-scrollbar utility class is properly defined in your CSS.
#!/bin/bash
# Check if no-scrollbar utility class is defined
rg -l 'no-scrollbar' apps/frontend/src/styles/21-21: Verify scroll behavior after removing overflow restriction.
Removing overflow-y-hidden from the main container while having scrollable sections inside could potentially create double scrollbars. Please ensure this doesn't cause any layout issues, especially when all inner sections are scrolled to their limits.
✅ Verification successful
Removing overflow-y-hidden from main container is correct
The removal of overflow-y-hidden from the main container is actually the right approach here. The code shows a well-structured scrolling hierarchy:
- All scrollable sections use the
no-scrollbarclass which explicitly hides scrollbars (as seen in main.css) - Each scrollable section has proper height constraints (
h-[30vh],h-[90vh]) andoverflow-y-scroll - The
no-scrollbarclass is properly defined in CSS to handle both webkit and firefox browsers
There won't be any double scrollbar issues since the scrollbars are explicitly hidden on the inner sections while maintaining their scroll functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential scroll-related CSS conflicts
rg -A 2 'overflow-y-' apps/frontend/src/
Length of output: 276
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for scroll-related styles and overflow patterns more comprehensively
rg -A 2 'overflow' apps/frontend/src/components/Today/TodayPage.tsx
# Check the main.css file for any global scroll-related styles
cat apps/frontend/src/styles/main.css
# Look for other components that might affect scrolling behavior
rg -A 2 'className=".*scroll' apps/frontend/src/components/Today/
Length of output: 6706
37-37: Verify responsiveness with increased agenda width.
The agenda section width has been increased to max-w-[400px]. Please ensure this doesn't cause layout issues on smaller screens. Consider adding responsive breakpoints to adjust the width based on screen size.
✅ Verification successful
Width adjustment is consistent with responsive design patterns
The increased width to max-w-[400px] with w-[96%] is actually a good responsive approach because:
- The percentage width (96%) ensures the section adapts to smaller screens
- The max-width cap prevents excessive stretching on larger screens
- Other sections in the component already use similar responsive patterns with max-width constraints
- The component uses Tailwind's responsive utilities in related components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for responsive design patterns in the codebase
rg -A 2 'sm:|md:|lg:|xl:' apps/frontend/src/components/Today/
Length of output: 276
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the component and its parent components for responsive design patterns
rg -A 2 'sm:|md:|lg:|xl:' apps/frontend/src/components/
# Also check for any width-related classes in the component
rg -A 2 'w-\[.*\]|max-w-\[.*\]' apps/frontend/src/components/Today/TodayPage.tsx
# Check if there are any media queries or responsive utilities in the styles
rg -A 2 '@media' apps/frontend/src/styles/
Length of output: 5634
| <div className="no-scrollbar h-[90vh] overflow-y-scroll text-secondary-foreground"> | ||
| <TodayMeetings selectedDate={selectedDate} /> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Consider a more accessible scrolling implementation
The current implementation has several concerns:
- The
no-scrollbarclass completely hides scrollbars (display: noneandscrollbar-width: none), which impacts accessibility for users who rely on visual scrollbar indicators. - Multiple instances of viewport-height based containers (
30vhand90vh) were found in TodayPage.tsx, which could cause layout issues.
Recommendations:
- Replace
no-scrollbarwith the existing styled scrollbar implementation frommain.cssthat provides visual feedback - Use
max-heightinstead of fixedheightwith viewport units to ensure better responsiveness - Consider implementing
scrollbar-gutter: stableto prevent layout shifts
🔗 Analysis chain
Address accessibility concerns with hidden scrollbars.
While hiding scrollbars might improve aesthetics, it can impact accessibility. Consider:
- Adding visual indicators for scrollable content
- Ensuring keyboard navigation works properly
- Using CSS
scrollbar-gutterto prevent layout shifts
Also, the fixed 90vh height might be excessive and could cause issues on smaller screens.
Let me analyze the scrollbar implementation and accessibility patterns to provide a more accurate assessment.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for accessibility patterns in the codebase
rg -l 'aria-|role=' apps/frontend/src/components/Today/
Length of output: 276
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for no-scrollbar usage and related styles
rg -l "no-scrollbar" apps/frontend/src/
# Check for accessibility patterns in Today components
rg "aria-|role=" apps/frontend/src/components/Today/
# Look for viewport height related styles
rg "vh" apps/frontend/src/components/Today/
# Check main.css for scrollbar related styles
cat apps/frontend/src/styles/main.css
Length of output: 5808
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/frontend/src/components/TodayItems.tsx (1)
70-70: Consider accessibility implications of hidden scrollbars.While the
no-scrollbarutility class improves visual aesthetics, hidden scrollbars might impact accessibility for users who rely on visible scroll indicators. Consider:
- Using CSS that maintains minimal visual scrollbar
- Ensuring keyboard navigation works properly
-<div className="no-scrollbar max-h-[90vh] space-y-2 overflow-y-auto"> +<div className="scrollbar-thin scrollbar-thumb-gray-300 max-h-[90vh] space-y-2 overflow-y-auto">
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/frontend/src/components/Today/TodayPage.tsx(2 hunks)apps/frontend/src/components/TodayItems.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/frontend/src/components/Today/TodayPage.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/frontend/src/components/TodayItems.tsx (1)
70-70: LGTM: Scroll behavior implementation aligns with requirements.
The addition of max-h-[90vh] and overflow-y-auto successfully implements independent scrolling for the today items block, which directly addresses the requirements from issues #536 and MAR-303.
oliursahin
requested review from
oliursahin
and removed request for
oliursahin
What did you ship?
Fixes:
Checklist:
OR: