Sajdakabir/mar 271 sub item #541
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce a new controller function, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Hey there! 👋 We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification. Valid types:
Format: Error details: |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apps/backend/src/routers/lib/common.route.js (1)
26-26: Consider implementing complete CRUD operations for sub-items.While the GET route for sub-items is correctly implemented, consider adding the following routes to support full CRUD operations:
router.route("/inbox/:item/sub-items/").get(getSubItemsController); +router.route("/inbox/:item/sub-items/").post(createSubItemController); +router.route("/inbox/:item/sub-items/:subItem").put(updateSubItemController); +router.route("/inbox/:item/sub-items/:subItem").delete(deleteSubItemController);This would provide a complete API for managing sub-items, allowing:
- Creation of new sub-items
- Updates to existing sub-items
- Deletion of sub-items
Consider adding API documentation for these endpoints to help other developers understand the available operations and expected request/response formats.
apps/backend/src/models/lib/item.model.js (2)
75-78: Consider adding validation for circular references.The current implementation doesn't prevent circular parent-child relationships (e.g., item A → item B → item A), which could cause infinite loops in recursive operations.
Would you like me to provide an implementation for a pre-save middleware that validates the parent chain to prevent circular references?
75-78: Enhance schema for sub-item specific requirements.Based on the PR objectives (MAR-271), sub-items need additional functionality:
- Scheduling within the current week
- Cycle date association
- Completion date tracking
- Inbox categorization for unscheduled items
Consider adding fields to support these requirements:
parent: { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'Item', + index: true }, + subItemMetadata: { + isScheduledInCurrentWeek: Boolean, + cycleDate: Date, + inboxCategory: String + },apps/backend/src/controllers/lib/item.controller.js (1)
201-214: Consider enhancing error handling and validation.While the implementation follows the established pattern, consider these improvements:
- Add specific error handling for common cases
- Validate the parentId before processing
Consider updating the implementation:
const getSubItemsController = async (req, res, next) => { try { const user = req.user._id; const { item: parentId } = req.params; + if (!parentId) { + return res.status(400).json({ + message: "Parent item ID is required" + }); + } + const subItems = await getSubItems(user, parentId); res.status(200).json({ response: subItems }); } catch (err) { + if (err.name === 'ValidationError') { + return res.status(400).json({ + message: err.message + }); + } + if (err.name === 'NotFoundError') { + return res.status(404).json({ + message: 'Parent item not found' + }); + } next(err); } };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
apps/backend/src/controllers/lib/item.controller.js(3 hunks)apps/backend/src/models/lib/item.model.js(1 hunks)apps/backend/src/routers/lib/common.route.js(2 hunks)apps/backend/src/routers/lib/space.route.js(2 hunks)apps/backend/src/services/lib/item.service.js(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
apps/backend/src/routers/lib/common.route.js (1)
13-13: LGTM!
The import statement is correctly updated to include the new controller.
apps/backend/src/routers/lib/space.route.js (1)
16-17: LGTM! Import statements are properly structured.
The new imports follow the existing pattern and are correctly organized with other item-related controllers.
apps/backend/src/controllers/lib/item.controller.js (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import changes are well-organized.
The addition of getSubItems to the imports follows the established pattern and maintains code organization.
226-227: LGTM: Export changes are properly structured.
The new controller is correctly added to the exports, maintaining the existing pattern.
apps/backend/src/services/lib/item.service.js (2)
399-400: LGTM! Export statement correctly includes the new function.
The export statement has been properly updated to include the new getSubItems function while maintaining existing exports.
364-378: Verify Item model schema and controller integration.
Let's verify the implementation against the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Item model schema since the previous search didn't show the complete schema definition.
Let me check the complete Item schema definition to verify the parent field type and any other relevant fields.
Let me check one final thing to see the complete schema definition since it was cut off, specifically focusing on the parent field.
Implementation correctly matches the schema and is properly integrated
The verification confirms that:
- Item model has the required
parentfield as ObjectId with reference to 'Item' - The schema includes
isArchived,isDeletedfields used in the query - Controller and routes are properly integrated:
- Controller at
apps/backend/src/controllers/lib/item.controller.js - Routes defined at both
/inbox/:item/sub-items/and/:space/blocks/:block/items/:item/sub-items/
- Controller at
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Item model schema and controller integration
# Test 1: Check if Item model has parent field
echo "Checking Item model schema..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const ItemSchema = new Schema({
$$$
parent: {
$$$
},
$$$
})'
# Test 2: Check controller implementation
echo "Checking controller implementation..."
rg -A 5 "getSubItemsController.*=.*async.*\(.*\).*=>"
# Test 3: Check route definitions
echo "Checking route definitions..."
rg "sub-items" --type js
Length of output: 1290
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Item model schema definition
echo "Searching for Item model schema..."
rg -A 20 "const ItemSchema = new Schema\(" --type js
# Check for any other references to parent field in Item related files
echo "Checking parent field references..."
rg "parent:" --type js
Length of output: 1678
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete Item schema definition
echo "Getting complete Item schema..."
rg -A 50 "const ItemSchema = new Schema\(" apps/backend/src/models/lib/item.model.js
# Check for any validation or middleware on the parent field
echo "Checking for schema middleware..."
rg -B 5 -A 5 "ItemSchema\.(pre|post|virtual|path)" apps/backend/src/models/lib/item.model.js
Length of output: 1903
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search specifically for parent field definition in Item model
echo "Searching for parent field..."
rg -B 5 -A 5 "parent: \{" apps/backend/src/models/lib/item.model.js
# Check for any references to isArchived, isDeleted fields
echo "Checking for isArchived and isDeleted fields..."
rg "isArchived|isDeleted" apps/backend/src/models/lib/item.model.js
Length of output: 585
| @@ -64,6 +65,7 @@ router.route("/:space/blocks/:block/items/").post(createItemController); | |||
| router.route("/:space/blocks/:block/items/").get(getAllItemsByBloackController); | |||
| router.route("/:space/blocks/:block/items/:item/").get(getItemController); | |||
| router.route("/:space/blocks/:block/items/:item/").put(updateItemController); | |||
| router.route("/:space/blocks/:block/items/:item/sub-items/").get(getSubItemsController); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Parent-child relationship is properly implemented, but route documentation is missing
The implementation shows proper parent-child constraints through:
- Schema definition with proper parent reference (
parent: { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'Item' }) - Service layer validation that checks for parent existence and user ownership
- Controller correctly extracting parent ID from params and passing to service
However, the route lacks JSDoc documentation for its purpose and parameters.
apps/backend/src/routers/lib/space.route.js: Add JSDoc comments above the route definition to document:- Purpose of the sub-items endpoint
- Required URL parameters (space, block, item)
- Expected response format
- Authentication requirements
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding route documentation and verify parent-child constraints.
The new sub-items route follows RESTful conventions and is well-structured. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add JSDoc comments to document the route's purpose and expected parameters
- Verify that the parent-child relationship is properly enforced in the controller
Let's verify the implementation of parent-child constraints:
Let me try a different approach to verify the implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify parent-child relationship implementation
# Check controller implementation
echo "Checking controller implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export const getSubItemsController = async (req, res) => {
$$$
}'
# Check service implementation
echo "Checking service implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export const getSubItems = async ($$$) => {
$$$
}'
# Check model schema
echo "Checking parent field in ItemSchema..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const ItemSchema = new Schema({
$$$
parent: {
$$$
}
$$$
})'
Length of output: 509
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the controller file and its content
echo "Searching for controller file..."
rg -l "getSubItemsController" --type js
echo "\nChecking controller implementation..."
rg "getSubItemsController" -A 10 --type js
echo "\nSearching for related service file..."
rg -l "getSubItems" --type js
echo "\nChecking service implementation..."
rg "getSubItems" -A 10 --type js
echo "\nSearching for schema definitions..."
rg "Schema.*subItems|parent" -A 5 --type js
Length of output: 15698
| parent: { | ||
| type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, | ||
| ref: 'Item' | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add an index to optimize parent-child queries.
Since the feature involves retrieving sub-items frequently, adding an index on the parent field would improve query performance.
parent: {
type: Schema.Types.ObjectId,
- ref: 'Item'
+ ref: 'Item',
+ index: true
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| parent: { | |
| type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, | |
| ref: 'Item' | |
| }, | |
| parent: { | |
| type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, | |
| ref: 'Item', | |
| index: true | |
| }, |
💡 Codebase verification
Parent-child relationship maintenance needs improvement
The codebase currently has basic parent-child relationship support through the parent field in the Item model and getSubItems service method, but lacks critical data integrity features:
- No middleware to handle orphaned sub-items when a parent is deleted
- No cascading status updates from parent to children
- No cleanup of parent references when items are archived or soft-deleted
Key evidence:
- Item model has
parentfield referencing other items getSubItemsservice method only queries children- No pre/post middleware for maintaining referential integrity
- No service methods for handling parent-child relationship updates
Recommendation: Implement middleware and service methods to:
- Clean up child references when parent is deleted/archived
- Optionally propagate status changes to children
- Maintain data consistency during parent-child operations
🔗 Analysis chain
Enhance middleware for parent-child relationship maintenance.
Consider adding middleware to maintain parent-child relationship integrity:
- Handle orphaned sub-items when a parent is deleted
- Optionally propagate status changes from parent to children
Let's verify if there are any existing cascade delete implementations:
The previous search might have been too specific. Let's broaden our search to:
- Find all mongoose middleware definitions
- Look for any delete operations
- Check how parent-child relationships are handled in the codebase
The previous search revealed delete operations but we need to specifically look at:
- The Item model schema and its middleware
- Any service layer handling of parent-child relationships
We need to:
- See the complete Item model to understand how the parent field is used
- Locate the item service file to check for any parent-child relationship handling
We need to:
- Check the item service implementation for any parent-child relationship handling
- Look for specific usage of the parent field in queries and updates
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for cascade delete patterns in mongoose middleware
rg -A 5 "pre\(['\"]deleteOne['\"]|pre\(['\"]findOneAndDelete['\"]"
Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for mongoose middleware and schema definitions
# First, find all mongoose schema and middleware files
fd -e js -e ts | xargs rg -l "mongoose|Schema" | xargs rg -A 5 "pre\(|schema\.pre"
# Also search for any delete-related operations
rg -A 5 "remove|delete|findOneAndDelete|deleteOne|deleteMany"
# Look for parent-child relationship handling
rg -B 2 -A 5 "parent.*ObjectId|parent.*ref"
Length of output: 48166
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the Item model and its middleware implementations
rg -B 5 -A 10 "ItemSchema" apps/backend/src/models/lib/item.model.js
# Also search for any cascade operations in the item service
fd -e js -e ts | grep -i "item.*service" | xargs rg -A 5 "delete|remove|update.*parent"
Length of output: 1314
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at the complete Item model schema to understand the parent field context
cat apps/backend/src/models/lib/item.model.js
# Also search for any item service files specifically
fd -t f -e js -e ts | grep -i "item.*service"
Length of output: 3354
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the item service implementation for parent-child handling
cat apps/backend/src/services/lib/item.service.js
# Also search for any usage of parent field in updates or queries
rg -B 2 -A 5 "parent.*:" apps/backend/src/services/lib/item.service.js
Length of output: 10860
| const user = req.user._id; | ||
| const { item: parentId } = req.params; | ||
|
|
||
| const subItems = await getSubItems(user, parentId); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Implementation does not meet PR requirements for scheduling and completion dates
The current getSubItems implementation does not fulfill the PR objectives:
- It doesn't include logic for handling items scheduled within the current week
- It doesn't handle completion dates, only filters them out with
isCompleted: false
Required changes:
- Add scheduling criteria to include items scheduled within current week
- Include completion date handling for done items instead of filtering them out
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify handling of scheduling and completion dates.
Based on the PR objectives, sub-items need special handling for scheduling and completion dates. Please verify that the getSubItems service implementation includes:
- Logic for handling items scheduled within the current week
- Proper handling of completion dates for done items
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the service implementation handles scheduling and completion dates
echo "Checking item.service.js for scheduling and completion date handling..."
rg -A 10 "getSubItems.*=" "src/services/lib/item.service.js"
Length of output: 286
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find the correct path for item service implementation
fd "item.service" --type f
# Then search for getSubItems implementation across the codebase
rg -A 10 "getSubItems.*="
Length of output: 1839
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Item model schema to understand available fields
rg -A 15 "new Schema\({" apps/backend/src/models/item.model.js
# Also check if there are any scheduling-related queries in the service
rg -B 2 -A 5 "scheduledFor|dueDate|completedAt" apps/backend/src/services/lib/item.service.js
Length of output: 3541
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Item schema with a different pattern
rg -A 15 "const.*Schema.*=" apps/backend/src/models/item.model.js
# And check the complete getSubItems implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const getSubItems = async ($_, $_) => { $$$ }'
Length of output: 1367
| const getSubItems = async (user, parentId) => { | ||
| const subItems = await Item.find({ | ||
| parent: parentId, | ||
| user, | ||
| isArchived: false, | ||
| isDeleted: false, | ||
| isCompleted: false | ||
| }); | ||
| if (!subItems.length) { | ||
| const error = new Error("No sub-items found for this parent item."); | ||
| error.statusCode = 404; | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } | ||
| return subItems; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add parent item validation and pagination support.
The getSubItems function has several areas for improvement:
- It should validate that the parent item exists and belongs to the user before querying sub-items.
- For scalability, consider adding pagination support to handle large sets of sub-items.
Consider this implementation:
const getSubItems = async (user, parentId) => {
+ const parentItem = await Item.findOne({
+ _id: parentId,
+ user,
+ isArchived: false,
+ isDeleted: false
+ });
+
+ if (!parentItem) {
+ const error = new Error("Parent item not found or inaccessible.");
+ error.statusCode = 404;
+ throw error;
+ }
+
const subItems = await Item.find({
parent: parentId,
user,
isArchived: false,
isDeleted: false,
- isCompleted: false
- });
+ isCompleted: false
+ })
+ .limit(100) // Add pagination limit
+ .sort({ createdAt: -1 }); // Sort by creation date
if (!subItems.length) {
const error = new Error("No sub-items found for this parent item.");
error.statusCode = 404;
throw error;
}
return subItems;
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const getSubItems = async (user, parentId) => { | |
| const subItems = await Item.find({ | |
| parent: parentId, | |
| user, | |
| isArchived: false, | |
| isDeleted: false, | |
| isCompleted: false | |
| }); | |
| if (!subItems.length) { | |
| const error = new Error("No sub-items found for this parent item."); | |
| error.statusCode = 404; | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| return subItems; | |
| }; | |
| const getSubItems = async (user, parentId) => { | |
| const parentItem = await Item.findOne({ | |
| _id: parentId, | |
| user, | |
| isArchived: false, | |
| isDeleted: false | |
| }); | |
| if (!parentItem) { | |
| const error = new Error("Parent item not found or inaccessible."); | |
| error.statusCode = 404; | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| const subItems = await Item.find({ | |
| parent: parentId, | |
| user, | |
| isArchived: false, | |
| isDeleted: false, | |
| isCompleted: false | |
| }) | |
| .limit(100) // Add pagination limit | |
| .sort({ createdAt: -1 }); // Sort by creation date | |
| if (!subItems.length) { | |
| const error = new Error("No sub-items found for this parent item."); | |
| error.statusCode = 404; | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| return subItems; | |
| }; |
Implement cycle date and scheduling requirements.
Based on the PR objectives (MAR-271), the function should handle scheduled items and cycle dates. Currently, it's missing these key requirements:
- Sub-items scheduled within the current week should be treated as part of the cycle date
- Completed items should show completion dates in the "today" view
- Unscheduled items should be moved to inbox
Consider this enhanced implementation:
-const getSubItems = async (user, parentId) => {
+const getSubItems = async (user, parentId, options = {}) => {
+ const now = new Date();
+ const startOfWeek = new Date(now);
+ startOfWeek.setDate(now.getDate() - now.getDay());
+ startOfWeek.setHours(0, 0, 0, 0);
+
+ const endOfWeek = new Date(startOfWeek);
+ endOfWeek.setDate(startOfWeek.getDate() + 6);
+ endOfWeek.setHours(23, 59, 59, 999);
+
const subItems = await Item.find({
parent: parentId,
user,
isArchived: false,
isDeleted: false,
- isCompleted: false
+ $or: [
+ // Incomplete items
+ {
+ isCompleted: false,
+ $or: [
+ // Items scheduled for this week
+ {
+ "cycle.startsAt": {
+ $gte: startOfWeek,
+ $lte: endOfWeek
+ }
+ },
+ // Unscheduled items (inbox)
+ {
+ "cycle.startsAt": null,
+ spaces: { $exists: true, $eq: [] }
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ // Show completed items in today view
+ {
+ isCompleted: true,
+ completedAt: {
+ $gte: new Date().setHours(0, 0, 0, 0),
+ $lt: new Date().setHours(23, 59, 59, 999)
+ }
+ }
+ ]
});
if (!subItems.length) {
const error = new Error("No sub-items found for this parent item.");
error.statusCode = 404;
throw error;
}
return subItems;
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const getSubItems = async (user, parentId) => { | |
| const subItems = await Item.find({ | |
| parent: parentId, | |
| user, | |
| isArchived: false, | |
| isDeleted: false, | |
| isCompleted: false | |
| }); | |
| if (!subItems.length) { | |
| const error = new Error("No sub-items found for this parent item."); | |
| error.statusCode = 404; | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| return subItems; | |
| }; | |
| const getSubItems = async (user, parentId, options = {}) => { | |
| const now = new Date(); | |
| const startOfWeek = new Date(now); | |
| startOfWeek.setDate(now.getDate() - now.getDay()); | |
| startOfWeek.setHours(0, 0, 0, 0); | |
| const endOfWeek = new Date(startOfWeek); | |
| endOfWeek.setDate(startOfWeek.getDate() + 6); | |
| endOfWeek.setHours(23, 59, 59, 999); | |
| const subItems = await Item.find({ | |
| parent: parentId, | |
| user, | |
| isArchived: false, | |
| isDeleted: false, | |
| $or: [ | |
| // Incomplete items | |
| { | |
| isCompleted: false, | |
| $or: [ | |
| // Items scheduled for this week | |
| { | |
| "cycle.startsAt": { | |
| $gte: startOfWeek, | |
| $lte: endOfWeek | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| // Unscheduled items (inbox) | |
| { | |
| "cycle.startsAt": null, | |
| spaces: { $exists: true, $eq: [] } | |
| } | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| // Show completed items in today view | |
| { | |
| isCompleted: true, | |
| completedAt: { | |
| $gte: new Date().setHours(0, 0, 0, 0), | |
| $lt: new Date().setHours(23, 59, 59, 999) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| ] | |
| }); | |
| if (!subItems.length) { | |
| const error = new Error("No sub-items found for this parent item."); | |
| error.statusCode = 404; | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| return subItems; | |
| }; |
What did you ship?
sub item
Fixes:
Checklist:
OR: