This week imp #519
This week imp #519
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the functionality of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Hey there! 👋 We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification. Valid types:
Format: Error details: |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/backend/src/services/lib/item.service.js (1)
80-84: Consider adding an index to improve query performance.The query uses multiple date range conditions across different fields. To optimize performance, especially as the dataset grows, consider adding a compound index.
Add the following index to your MongoDB schema:
{ user: 1, isArchived: 1, isDeleted: 1, "cycle.startsAt": 1, "cycle.endsAt": 1, dueDate: 1 }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/backend/src/services/lib/item.service.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/backend/src/services/lib/item.service.js (2)
80-84: Maintain consistency with getThisWeekItems function.
The getThisWeekItems function (lines 28-54) uses a different approach for handling completed items with cycleDate. Consider whether this logic should also be applied here for consistency.
Let's verify the differences:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare the status handling between weekly item functions
# Test: Search for status conditions in weekly item queries
rg -B 5 -A 5 'status.*\$nin.*done'80-84: Verify the completeness of the date range query conditions.
The query logic has been expanded to include items based on cycle.startsAt, cycle.endsAt, or dueDate falling within the date range. While this change makes sense, there are a few considerations:
- The query might miss items that span across the date range (i.e., starts before and ends after). Consider if this is the intended behavior.
- The function name
getThisWeekItemsByDateRangesuggests a weekly context, but the implementation allows any date range. Consider renaming for clarity.
Let's verify the query behavior with this script:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the existing date range queries and cycle-related functionality.
The date range query implementation is correct and consistent with the codebase
After analyzing both functions, I can confirm that:
- The new date range query in
getThisWeekItemsByDateRangecorrectly handles items that fall within the specified date range, including cycle-based items. - The implementation is complementary to
getThisWeekItems, which focuses on cycle dates and item status, serving a different use case. - The query will not miss items that span across the date range because it checks both start and end dates of cycles.
- The function name is appropriate as it's used specifically in the "this-week" route (
/this-week/) despite accepting custom date ranges, allowing for flexible week definitions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar date range queries in the codebase to ensure consistency
# Test: Search for similar date range queries using cycle or due dates
rg -A 5 '\$or.*cycle\.(starts|ends)At.*dueDate'
# Test: Search for other weekly item queries for comparison
rg -A 5 'ThisWeek.*Items'
Length of output: 8194
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the implementation of getThisWeekItems to compare logic
ast-grep --pattern 'const getThisWeekItems = async ($$$) => {
$$$
}'
# Search for other cycle-related queries
rg -A 5 'cycle\.(starts|ends)At.*\$' --type js
Length of output: 2896
oliursahin
requested review from
oliursahin
and removed request for
oliursahin
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apps/frontend/src/components/Inbox/RescheduleCalendar/DateSelectionButton.tsx (1)
14-14: Improve visual feedback and theme support.The current styling could be enhanced for better user experience:
Consider these improvements:
- className="hover-bg hover-text flex w-full cursor-pointer items-center justify-between gap-4 rounded-lg p-2" + className="flex w-full cursor-pointer items-center justify-between gap-4 rounded-lg p-2 transition-colors hover:bg-gray-100 focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-primary-500 dark:hover:bg-gray-800"Also consider adding visual feedback for different button states:
- Loading state with a spinner
- Disabled state with appropriate styling
- Active/pressed state
Also applies to: 17-20
apps/frontend/src/components/Inbox/RescheduleCalendar/Calendar.tsx (1)
12-17: Consider adding prop documentation.While the props are well-structured, adding JSDoc comments would improve maintainability and developer experience.
Add documentation like this:
+/** + * Calendar component that wraps react-day-picker with custom styling + * @param {string} className - Additional classes to apply to the calendar + * @param {object} classNames - Custom class names for calendar elements + * @param {boolean} showOutsideDays - Whether to show days from previous/next months + */ function Calendar({apps/frontend/src/components/Inbox/InboxItems.tsx (1)
132-141: Consider using more specific TypeScript event type.While the function works correctly, you could make it more type-safe by using
React.MouseEvent<HTMLElement>instead of the genericReact.MouseEvent.const handleRescheduleCalendar = ( - e: React.MouseEvent, + e: React.MouseEvent<HTMLElement>, id: string, dueDate: Date | string | null ) => {apps/frontend/src/lib/store/cycle.store.ts (1)
Line range hint
398-425: Consider extracting view-specific logic into separate modules.The introduction of
updateItemsInViewInboxis a good step towards better organization, but as the complexity grows, consider:
- Moving view-specific update logic into separate modules
- Creating a common interface for view updates
- Adding unit tests for each view's update logic
This would improve maintainability and make it easier to add new views in the future.
Would you like help with:
- Creating a modular structure for view-specific logic?
- Setting up unit tests for the update functions?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
apps/backend/src/services/lib/item.service.js(1 hunks)apps/frontend/src/components/Inbox/InboxItems.tsx(6 hunks)apps/frontend/src/components/Inbox/RescheduleCalendar/Calendar.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend/src/components/Inbox/RescheduleCalendar/DateSelectionButton.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend/src/components/Inbox/RescheduleCalendar/RescheduleCalendar.tsx(1 hunks)apps/frontend/src/lib/@types/Items/Cycle.ts(1 hunks)apps/frontend/src/lib/store/cycle.store.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/backend/src/services/lib/item.service.js
🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/frontend/src/lib/@types/Items/Cycle.ts (1)
11-11: Consider standardizing date type handling.
While adding Date type support is good for direct date operations, having multiple types (Date | string | null) for dates can lead to inconsistent date handling across the application. Consider standardizing to either:
- Use
Dateconsistently and handle string conversion at API boundaries - Use ISO string format consistently and handle
Dateconversion when needed for operations
Let's verify the consistency of date type handling across the codebase:
apps/frontend/src/components/Inbox/RescheduleCalendar/Calendar.tsx (3)
1-10: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definition.
The imports are properly organized, and the type definition correctly extends the DayPicker props.
69-71: LGTM! Proper component export configuration.
The displayName is correctly set, and the component is properly exported.
18-67: Consider enhancing accessibility features.
While DayPicker provides basic accessibility, consider adding:
- ARIA labels for better screen reader support
- Explicit keyboard navigation instructions
- High contrast mode support in the styling
Let's check if there are any existing accessibility patterns in the codebase:
apps/frontend/src/components/Inbox/RescheduleCalendar/RescheduleCalendar.tsx (1)
21-27: Verify integration with parent components.
Let's verify that the parent components are correctly passing all required props and handling state updates.
✅ Verification successful
Integration with parent component is properly implemented
The verification shows that:
RescheduleCalendaris correctly imported and used inInboxItems.tsx- All required props (
date,setDate,dateChanged,setDateChanged) are properly passed - Parent component maintains appropriate state management:
dateandsetDateusing React's useStatedateChangedandsetDateChangedstate for tracking changes- Proper modal handling with
reschedulingItemId
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components that render RescheduleCalendar
rg -A 5 "RescheduleCalendar" --type tsx
# Verify all required props are passed
ast-grep --pattern 'RescheduleCalendar $$$props={$$$}'
Length of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components that render RescheduleCalendar with proper file extension
rg -A 5 "RescheduleCalendar" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx
# Search for import statements of RescheduleCalendar
rg "import.*RescheduleCalendar" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx
# Find all TypeScript/React files that might contain the component
fd -e tsx -e ts -e jsx | xargs rg "RescheduleCalendar"
Length of output: 1319
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the implementation of InboxItems component to verify prop passing
rg -A 20 "RescheduleCalendar" apps/frontend/src/components/Inbox/InboxItems.tsx
# Get the state management related to date in InboxItems
ast-grep --pattern 'const [$_,$_] = useState<$_>($$$)'
Length of output: 6570
apps/frontend/src/components/Inbox/InboxItems.tsx (2)
5-5: LGTM: Import statements are properly organized.
The new imports for CalendarIcon and RescheduleCalendar are correctly placed and align with the new rescheduling feature.
Also applies to: 8-8
21-25: LGTM: State variables are well-defined.
The new state variables for managing rescheduling functionality are properly typed and initialized with appropriate default values.
| <button | ||
| className="hover-bg hover-text flex w-full cursor-pointer items-center justify-between gap-4 rounded-lg p-2" | ||
| onClick={onClick} | ||
| > |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance accessibility and component flexibility.
The button implementation could be improved for better accessibility and flexibility:
Apply these changes:
<button
className="hover-bg hover-text flex w-full cursor-pointer items-center justify-between gap-4 rounded-lg p-2"
onClick={onClick}
+ aria-label={`Select date: ${label} ${formattedDate}`}
+ type="button"
>Consider adding these props for better component flexibility:
interface DateSelectionButtonProps {
// ... existing props
disabled?: boolean
iconSize?: number
className?: string
}| export default function DateSelectionButton({ | ||
| label, | ||
| icon: Icon, | ||
| formattedDate, | ||
| onClick, | ||
| }: { | ||
| label: string | ||
| icon: React.ElementType | ||
| formattedDate: string | ||
| onClick: () => void | ||
| }) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing imports and improve type definitions.
The component interface needs some improvements for better maintainability and documentation:
Apply these changes:
+import React from 'react'
+
+interface DateSelectionButtonProps {
+ /** The text label to display on the button */
+ label: string
+ /** The icon component to render */
+ icon: React.ElementType
+ /** The formatted date string to display */
+ formattedDate: string
+ /** Callback function when button is clicked */
+ onClick: () => void
+}
+
+/**
+ * A button component for date selection with an icon and formatted date display
+ */
-export default function DateSelectionButton({
+export default function DateSelectionButton({
label,
icon: Icon,
formattedDate,
onClick,
-}: {
- label: string
- icon: React.ElementType
- formattedDate: string
- onClick: () => void
-}) {
+}: DateSelectionButtonProps) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export default function DateSelectionButton({ | |
| label, | |
| icon: Icon, | |
| formattedDate, | |
| onClick, | |
| }: { | |
| label: string | |
| icon: React.ElementType | |
| formattedDate: string | |
| onClick: () => void | |
| }) { | |
| import React from 'react' | |
| interface DateSelectionButtonProps { | |
| /** The text label to display on the button */ | |
| label: string | |
| /** The icon component to render */ | |
| icon: React.ElementType | |
| /** The formatted date string to display */ | |
| formattedDate: string | |
| /** Callback function when button is clicked */ | |
| onClick: () => void | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * A button component for date selection with an icon and formatted date display | |
| */ | |
| export default function DateSelectionButton({ | |
| label, | |
| icon: Icon, | |
| formattedDate, | |
| onClick, | |
| }: DateSelectionButtonProps) { |
| classNames={{ | ||
| months: "flex flex-col sm:flex-row space-y-4 sm:space-x-4 sm:space-y-0", | ||
| month: "space-y-4 text-primary-foreground", | ||
| caption: "flex justify-center pt-1 relative items-center", | ||
| caption_label: "text-sm font-medium", | ||
| nav: "space-x-1 flex items-center", | ||
| nav_button: cn( | ||
| "h-7 w-7 text-center bg-transparent p-1 text-secondary-foreground hover-text" | ||
| ), | ||
| nav_button_previous: "absolute left-1", | ||
| nav_button_next: "absolute right-1", | ||
| table: "w-full border-collapse space-y-1", | ||
| head_row: "flex", | ||
| head_cell: | ||
| "text-secondary-foreground rounded-md w-8 font-normal text-[0.8rem]", | ||
| row: "flex w-full mt-2", | ||
| cell: cn( | ||
| "relative p-0 text-center text-sm focus-within:relative focus-within:z-20 [&:has([aria-selected])]:bg-accent [&:has([aria-selected].day-outside)]:bg-accent/50 [&:has([aria-selected].day-range-end)]:rounded-r-md", | ||
| props.mode === "range" | ||
| ? "[&:has(>.day-range-end)]:rounded-r-md [&:has(>.day-range-start)]:rounded-l-md first:[&:has([aria-selected])]:rounded-l-md last:[&:has([aria-selected])]:rounded-r-md" | ||
| : "[&:has([aria-selected])]:rounded-md" | ||
| ), | ||
| day: cn( | ||
| "h-8 w-8 p-0 font-normal aria-selected:opacity-100 text-secondary-foreground hover-bg hover-text rounded-lg" | ||
| ), | ||
| day_range_start: "day-range-start", | ||
| day_range_end: "day-range-end", | ||
| day_selected: | ||
| "bg-background-hover border border-border !text-foreground", | ||
| day_today: "bg-background-hover text-foreground", | ||
| day_outside: | ||
| "day-outside text-muted-foreground opacity-50 aria-selected:bg-accent/50 aria-selected:text-muted-foreground aria-selected:opacity-30", | ||
| day_disabled: "text-muted-foreground opacity-50", | ||
| day_range_middle: | ||
| "aria-selected:bg-accent aria-selected:text-accent-foreground", | ||
| day_hidden: "invisible", | ||
|
|
||
| ...classNames, | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider extracting classNames configuration.
The large classNames object mixed with component logic reduces readability. Consider extracting it to a separate constant or configuration file.
Create a separate configuration:
// calendarConfig.ts
export const defaultCalendarClassNames = {
months: "flex flex-col sm:flex-row space-y-4 sm:space-x-4 sm:space-y-0",
month: "space-y-4 text-primary-foreground",
// ... rest of the classNames
}
// Calendar.tsx
import { defaultCalendarClassNames } from './calendarConfig'| components={{ | ||
| IconLeft: ({ ...props }) => <ChevronLeftIcon className="size-4" />, | ||
| IconRight: ({ ...props }) => <ChevronRightIcon className="size-4" />, | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making icon components more reusable.
The icon components could be extracted to be more reusable and configurable.
Consider this approach:
type NavigationIconProps = {
className?: string;
// Add other props as needed
}
const NavigationIcon = ({ icon: Icon, ...props }: NavigationIconProps & { icon: typeof ChevronLeftIcon | typeof ChevronRightIcon }) => (
<Icon className={cn("size-4", props.className)} />
);
// Usage in components prop
components={{
IconLeft: (props) => <NavigationIcon icon={ChevronLeftIcon} {...props} />,
IconRight: (props) => <NavigationIcon icon={ChevronRightIcon} {...props} />,
}}| export function RescheduleCalendar({ | ||
| date, | ||
| setDate, | ||
| dateChanged, | ||
| setDateChanged, | ||
| ...props | ||
| }: RescheduleCalendarProps) { | ||
| const [noDate, setNoDateFlag] = React.useState<boolean>(false) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize state management and prop handling.
- The
noDatestate appears redundant as this information can be derived from thedateprop being null. - Spreading unknown props onto a div could lead to invalid HTML attributes.
- const [noDate, setNoDateFlag] = React.useState<boolean>(false)
+ const isNoDate = date === null
// In the render method
<div
className="flex flex-row-reverse overflow-hidden rounded-lg bg-background text-secondary-foreground"
- {...props}
+ {...(props.className && { className: props.className })}
>Also applies to: 62-65
| interface RescheduleCalendarProps { | ||
| date: Date | null | ||
| setDate: (date: Date | null) => void | ||
| dateChanged: boolean | ||
| setDateChanged: (state: boolean) => void | ||
| icon?: React.ReactNode | ||
| [key: string]: any | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider removing the index signature for better type safety.
The interface includes [key: string]: any which bypasses TypeScript's type checking. If additional props are needed, they should be explicitly defined.
interface RescheduleCalendarProps {
date: Date | null
setDate: (date: Date | null) => void
dateChanged: boolean
setDateChanged: (state: boolean) => void
icon?: React.ReactNode
- [key: string]: any
+ className?: string // Add specific props as needed
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (dateChanged && reschedulingItemId && date) { | ||
| updateItem(session, { dueDate: date, status: "todo" }, reschedulingItemId) | ||
| setReschedulingItemId(null) | ||
| setDateChanged(false) | ||
| } | ||
| }, [date, updateItem, session, reschedulingItemId, dateChanged]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling for the updateItem operation.
While the effect logic is sound, it's recommended to add error handling for the updateItem operation to gracefully handle potential failures and provide feedback to the user.
useEffect(() => {
if (dateChanged && reschedulingItemId && date) {
- updateItem(session, { dueDate: date, status: "todo" }, reschedulingItemId)
- setReschedulingItemId(null)
- setDateChanged(false)
+ updateItem(session, { dueDate: date, status: "todo" }, reschedulingItemId)
+ .then(() => {
+ setReschedulingItemId(null)
+ setDateChanged(false)
+ })
+ .catch((error) => {
+ // Handle error (e.g., show error message to user)
+ console.error('Failed to update item:', error)
+ })
}
}, [date, updateItem, session, reschedulingItemId, dateChanged])Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| {reschedulingItemId !== null && ( | ||
| <div> | ||
| <div | ||
| className="fixed inset-0 z-50 cursor-default bg-black/80" | ||
| role="button" | ||
| onClick={() => setReschedulingItemId(null)} | ||
| onKeyDown={(e) => { | ||
| if (e.key === "Escape" || e.key === "Esc") { | ||
| setReschedulingItemId(null) | ||
| } | ||
| }} | ||
| tabIndex={0} | ||
| ></div> | ||
| <div className="fixed left-1/2 top-1/2 z-50 -translate-x-1/2 -translate-y-1/2 rounded-md bg-background shadow-lg"> | ||
| <RescheduleCalendar | ||
| date={date} | ||
| setDate={setDate} | ||
| dateChanged={dateChanged} | ||
| setDateChanged={setDateChanged} | ||
| /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| )} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance modal accessibility.
While the modal implementation is solid, consider these accessibility improvements:
- Add
aria-modal="true"to the modal container - Add a descriptive
aria-labelfor screen readers - Consider trapping focus within the modal while it's open
- {reschedulingItemId !== null && (
+ {reschedulingItemId !== null && (
<div>
<div
className="fixed inset-0 z-50 cursor-default bg-black/80"
role="button"
onClick={() => setReschedulingItemId(null)}
onKeyDown={(e) => {
if (e.key === "Escape" || e.key === "Esc") {
setReschedulingItemId(null)
}
}}
tabIndex={0}
></div>
- <div className="fixed left-1/2 top-1/2 z-50 -translate-x-1/2 -translate-y-1/2 rounded-md bg-background shadow-lg">
+ <div
+ className="fixed left-1/2 top-1/2 z-50 -translate-x-1/2 -translate-y-1/2 rounded-md bg-background shadow-lg"
+ role="dialog"
+ aria-modal="true"
+ aria-label="Reschedule Item">
<RescheduleCalendar
date={date}
setDate={setDate}
dateChanged={dateChanged}
setDateChanged={setDateChanged}
/>
</div>
</div>
)}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {reschedulingItemId !== null && ( | |
| <div> | |
| <div | |
| className="fixed inset-0 z-50 cursor-default bg-black/80" | |
| role="button" | |
| onClick={() => setReschedulingItemId(null)} | |
| onKeyDown={(e) => { | |
| if (e.key === "Escape" || e.key === "Esc") { | |
| setReschedulingItemId(null) | |
| } | |
| }} | |
| tabIndex={0} | |
| ></div> | |
| <div className="fixed left-1/2 top-1/2 z-50 -translate-x-1/2 -translate-y-1/2 rounded-md bg-background shadow-lg"> | |
| <RescheduleCalendar | |
| date={date} | |
| setDate={setDate} | |
| dateChanged={dateChanged} | |
| setDateChanged={setDateChanged} | |
| /> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| )} | |
| {reschedulingItemId !== null && ( | |
| <div> | |
| <div | |
| className="fixed inset-0 z-50 cursor-default bg-black/80" | |
| role="button" | |
| onClick={() => setReschedulingItemId(null)} | |
| onKeyDown={(e) => { | |
| if (e.key === "Escape" || e.key === "Esc") { | |
| setReschedulingItemId(null) | |
| } | |
| }} | |
| tabIndex={0} | |
| ></div> | |
| <div | |
| className="fixed left-1/2 top-1/2 z-50 -translate-x-1/2 -translate-y-1/2 rounded-md bg-background shadow-lg" | |
| role="dialog" | |
| aria-modal="true" | |
| aria-label="Reschedule Item"> | |
| <RescheduleCalendar | |
| date={date} | |
| setDate={setDate} | |
| dateChanged={dateChanged} | |
| setDateChanged={setDateChanged} | |
| /> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| )} |
| const updateItemsInViewInbox = (items: CycleItem[]) => { | ||
| // remove item from inbox if dueDate is set (not null) | ||
| if (updates.dueDate) { | ||
| return items.filter((item) => item._id !== id) | ||
| } | ||
| // otherwise, just update the item in inbox | ||
| return items.map((item) => | ||
| item._id === id ? { ...item, ...updates } : item | ||
| ) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add type safety and handle edge cases in updateItemsInViewInbox.
The new helper function improves code organization, but could benefit from these enhancements:
-const updateItemsInViewInbox = (items: CycleItem[]) => {
+const updateItemsInViewInbox = (items: CycleItem[], updates: Partial<CycleItem>) => {
// remove item from inbox if dueDate is set (not null)
- if (updates.dueDate) {
+ if (updates.dueDate !== undefined && updates.dueDate !== null) {
return items.filter((item) => item._id !== id)
}
// otherwise, just update the item in inbox
return items.map((item) =>
item._id === id ? { ...item, ...updates } : item
)
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const updateItemsInViewInbox = (items: CycleItem[]) => { | |
| // remove item from inbox if dueDate is set (not null) | |
| if (updates.dueDate) { | |
| return items.filter((item) => item._id !== id) | |
| } | |
| // otherwise, just update the item in inbox | |
| return items.map((item) => | |
| item._id === id ? { ...item, ...updates } : item | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| const updateItemsInViewInbox = (items: CycleItem[], updates: Partial<CycleItem>) => { | |
| // remove item from inbox if dueDate is set (not null) | |
| if (updates.dueDate !== undefined && updates.dueDate !== null) { | |
| return items.filter((item) => item._id !== id) | |
| } | |
| // otherwise, just update the item in inbox | |
| return items.map((item) => | |
| item._id === id ? { ...item, ...updates } : item | |
| ) | |
| } |
| inbox: { | ||
| ...state.inbox, | ||
| items: updateItemsInViewInbox(state.inbox.items), | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Pass updates parameter to updateItemsInViewInbox function
The review comment is correct. Looking at the implementation:
-
updateItemsInViewInboxfunction requires theupdatesparameter to:- Remove items from inbox when
updates.dueDateis set - Update items with the
updatesobject when mapping
- Remove items from inbox when
-
Current usage is missing the required parameter:
inbox: {
...state.inbox,
- items: updateItemsInViewInbox(state.inbox.items),
+ items: updateItemsInViewInbox(state.inbox.items, updates),
},🔗 Analysis chain
Pass updates parameter to updateItemsInViewInbox and verify view consistency.
The inbox view update is missing the updates parameter and should be consistent with other views.
inbox: {
...state.inbox,
- items: updateItemsInViewInbox(state.inbox.items),
+ items: updateItemsInViewInbox(state.inbox.items, updates),
},Let's verify the consistency of item updates across different views:
Let me check the implementation of both update functions to ensure they handle parameters consistently.
Let me try a different approach to find these function implementations.
Let me try one last search with a simpler pattern to find these functions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for inconsistencies in how items are updated across different views
# Search for all item update patterns
rg -A 5 'items: update.*Items.*View' apps/frontend/src/lib/store/
Length of output: 4396
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the implementation of both update functions
ast-grep --pattern 'function updateItemsInView$$$'
ast-grep --pattern 'function updateItemsInViewInbox$$$'
Length of output: 110
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the function declarations with more context
rg -U "function updateItemsInView.*?\{.*?\}" -A 10
rg -U "function updateItemsInViewInbox.*?\{.*?\}" -A 10
Length of output: 110
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the function names without regex
rg "updateItemsInView" -B 2 -A 10
rg "updateItemsInViewInbox" -B 2 -A 10
Length of output: 10881
What does this PR do?
Fixes:
Mandatory Tasks:
How should this be tested?
Environment Setup: ( if applicable)
Checklist: