Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🔍 Improve RFP return formula: (staticEval + beta)/2 #652

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

eduherminio
Copy link
Member

@eduherminio eduherminio commented Feb 12, 2024

Test  | rfp/wise-ciekce
Elo   | 1.12 +- 2.26 (95%)
SPRT  | 8.0+0.08s Threads=1 Hash=32MB
LLR   | -2.26 (-2.25, 2.89) [0.00, 5.00]
Games | N: 55718 W: 17207 L: 17028 D: 21483
Penta | [2102, 6441, 10659, 6490, 2167]
https://openbench.lynx-chess.com/test/148/

> python .\sprt.py -w 17207 -d 21483 -l 17028 -e0 0 -e1 3
ELO: 1.12 +- 2.26 [-1.14, 3.37]
LLR: -0.309 [0.0, 3.0] (-2.94, 2.94
Continue Playing

40+0.4 [0, 3] cancelled, unfortunately

Score of Lynx-rfp-wise-ciekce-2593-win-x64 vs Lynx 2592 - main: 2239 - 2103 - 3638  [0.509] 7980
...      Lynx-rfp-wise-ciekce-2593-win-x64 playing White: 1653 - 557 - 1780  [0.637] 3990
...      Lynx-rfp-wise-ciekce-2593-win-x64 playing Black: 586 - 1546 - 1858  [0.380] 3990
...      White vs Black: 3199 - 1143 - 3638  [0.629] 7980
Elo difference: 5.9 +/- 5.6, LOS: 98.0 %, DrawRatio: 45.6 %
SPRT: llr 1.61 (55.8%), lbound -2.25, ubound 2.89

@eduherminio eduherminio changed the title Improve RFP return: (staticEval + beta)/2 🔍 Improve RFP return formula: (staticEval + beta)/2 Feb 14, 2024
@eduherminio eduherminio marked this pull request as ready for review February 14, 2024 03:03
@eduherminio eduherminio enabled auto-merge (squash) February 14, 2024 03:03
@eduherminio eduherminio merged commit 9b82924 into main Feb 14, 2024
28 checks passed
@eduherminio eduherminio deleted the rfp/wise-ciekce branch February 14, 2024 03:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant