Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚡ Remove UCI hashfull command for performance reasons #342

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 15, 2023

Conversation

eduherminio
Copy link
Member

@eduherminio eduherminio commented Aug 15, 2023

Score of Lynx 1217 - no hashfull vs Lynx 0.15.0: 592 - 426 - 308  [0.563] 1326
...      Lynx 1217 - no hashfull playing White: 352 - 158 - 153  [0.646] 663
...      Lynx 1217 - no hashfull playing Black: 240 - 268 - 155  [0.479] 663
...      White vs Black: 620 - 398 - 308  [0.584] 1326
Elo difference: 43.7 +/- 16.5, LOS: 100.0 %, DrawRatio: 23.2 %
SPRT: llr 2.95 (100.1%), lbound -2.94, ubound 2.94 - H1 was accepted

@eduherminio eduherminio marked this pull request as ready for review August 15, 2023 16:24
@eduherminio
Copy link
Member Author

Will revisit hashfull using either a counter when inserting or an approximation method

@eduherminio eduherminio merged commit 42e862e into main Aug 15, 2023
@eduherminio eduherminio deleted the perf/remove-hashfull branch August 15, 2023 16:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant