-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 221
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prepare for release 0.5.0 #631
Conversation
29b817e
to
0dbcef6
Compare
0dbcef6
to
a22c30d
Compare
/hold |
a22c30d
to
7371726
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: terrytangyuan The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/assign @tenzen-y |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Basically, lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
go.mod
Outdated
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
module github.com/kubeflow/mpi-operator | |||
|
|||
go 1.20 | |||
go 1.22 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you submit the dedicated PR since all other PRs depend on this Go version update?
@@ -1,5 +1,17 @@ | |||
# MPI Operator Releases | |||
|
|||
## Release v0.5.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we mention that we have started to support K8s v1.28 and v1.29?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
uhm... it should have run before. But I can mention it in the cleanups.
Are we missing any PR before I rebase?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
uhm... it should have run before. But I can mention it in the cleanups.
That makes sense.
Are we missing any PR before I rebase?
The last piece is #634.
Part-of: #563 |
7371726
to
e1899f9
Compare
rebased |
Signed-off-by: Aldo Culquicondor <[email protected]>
e1899f9
to
14c355f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
/lgtm
/hold cancel
/assign @tenzen-y
I created release notes manually by inspecting v0.4.0...79a9b37
Part-of: #563