Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump assertj-core from 3.21.0 to 3.22.0 #473

Merged

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 3, 2022

Bumps assertj-core from 3.21.0 to 3.22.0.

Commits
  • 5e4779c [maven-release-plugin] prepare release assertj-core-3.22.0
  • 2213028 Fix javadoc
  • 1b3c46d Update bdnrun version
  • 83c6e07 Add a default implementation for unambiguousToStringOf in Representation.
  • 35bed61 Javadoc improvements
  • ab9cb22 Bump project version to 3.22.0-SNAPSHOT
  • 6cd5811 Add catchThrowableOfType enriched alternatives (#2410)
  • 367d110 Javadoc typo
  • 0a5bf8d Add doesNotReturn to Object assertions (#2453)
  • 471e8a8 Switch to the official Maven Wrapper by Apache (#2452)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [assertj-core](https://github.com/assertj/assertj-core) from 3.21.0 to 3.22.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/assertj/assertj-core/releases)
- [Commits](assertj/assertj@assertj-core-3.21.0...assertj-core-3.22.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: org.assertj:assertj-core
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 3, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #473 (8bdc80e) into main (a734f0a) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main      #473   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity       751       751           
===========================================
  Files            143       143           
  Lines           2339      2339           
  Branches          39        39           
===========================================
  Hits            2339      2339           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a734f0a...8bdc80e. Read the comment docs.

@pascalgrimaud pascalgrimaud merged commit bfbbcb4 into main Jan 3, 2022
@pascalgrimaud pascalgrimaud deleted the dependabot/maven/org.assertj-assertj-core-3.22.0 branch January 3, 2022 12:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant