Update RFC URLs to modern location #1315
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
n.b., I did not update URLs in the changelog on the theory that it's archival |
n2ygk
force-pushed
the
update-rfc-url
branch
from
5e26e9f to
80bbb04
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1315 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.37% 97.37%
=======================================
Files 32 32
Lines 2022 2022
=======================================
Hits 1969 1969
Misses 53 53
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #1313
Description of the Change
This updates RFC references that pointed at now-deprecated
tools.ietf.orgto userfc-editor.orginstead. Several links were updated from http to https. A reference inoauth2_validators.pywas still referring to an old revision of the pre-RFC draft, so I've updated that to the corresponding section of the published RFC (the text in that section looked unchanged at a glance).Checklist
CHANGELOG.mdupdated (only for user relevant changes)AUTHORS