Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discover new devices at runtime in onewire #135199

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

epenet
Copy link
Contributor

@epenet epenet commented Jan 9, 2025

Proposed change

Scan the bus every 5 minutes, and use dispatcher to create the new entities

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

Copy link

@home-assistant home-assistant bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a merge conflict.

@home-assistant
Copy link

home-assistant bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Hey there @garbled1, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (onewire) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of onewire can trigger bot actions by commenting:

  • @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
  • @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
  • @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
  • @home-assistant unassign onewire Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
  • @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the pull request.
  • @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the pull request.

@epenet epenet force-pushed the epenet-20250109-1521 branch from ad8db94 to c3145a3 Compare January 9, 2025 17:21
@epenet epenet marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2025 17:21
Comment on lines +52 to +46
SIGNAL_NEW_DEVICE_CONNECTED = SignalType["OneWireHub", list[OWDeviceDescription]](
f"{DOMAIN}_new_device_connected"
)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh we even have these types now? Neat

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh we even have these types now? Neat

Yeah - just stumbled upon it myself!

async_fire_time_changed(hass)
await hass.async_block_till_done(wait_background_tasks=True)

await snapshot_platform(hass, entity_registry, snapshot, config_entry.entry_id)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's not add more snapshots unless there is any relevance in storing the data. Because I think this test would also be good if we just checked that we discovered them. This avoid unneeded snapshots

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's not add more snapshots unless there is any relevance in storing the data. Because I think this test would also be good if we just checked that we discovered them. This avoid unneeded snapshots

Removed

@home-assistant home-assistant bot marked this pull request as draft January 9, 2025 17:40
@home-assistant
Copy link

home-assistant bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

@epenet epenet marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2025 20:14
@home-assistant home-assistant bot requested a review from joostlek January 9, 2025 20:14
@epenet epenet force-pushed the epenet-20250109-1521 branch from b49adc2 to 224bc79 Compare January 10, 2025 10:22
@epenet
Copy link
Contributor Author

epenet commented Jan 10, 2025

Rebased to fix conflicts

Copy link
Member

@joostlek joostlek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we also update the quality scale yaml

@joostlek joostlek merged commit 475a2fb into home-assistant:dev Jan 10, 2025
34 checks passed
@epenet epenet deleted the epenet-20250109-1521 branch January 10, 2025 10:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants