You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi all! Reposting #765 (comment) here as a new issue. Hope you all don't mind.
Some work on this project is clearly happening, primarily by @rwhogg. Great, thank you! We really do appreciate it.
It's not a lot, though. Details below.
I don't mean to be ungrateful. ndb is awesome, many of us have obviously used and benefited it for decades (!) now. Thank you! However, for those of us still actively building and maintaining our own projects on ndb, it's important for us to understand the maintainers' (ie Google's) level of ongoing commitment and investment here.
Will this project eventually be sunsetted? Will it continue on with minimal support? Or is there a path toward you all engaging more actively here? Any answer is ok! But if we want a datastore client library that's more actively maintained, do we need to start planning to eventually migrate to the official datastore client, or another library?
Thanks in advance.
--
Looking at recent PRs, the vast majority are administrative or chores: docs, tests, dependencies, other minor refactorings and cleanups. Which are good! But of the ~100 PRs over the last year, it looks like just five are actual bug fixes or otherwise noticeable code changes: #882, #877, #873, #852, #815.
That may be OK. Development on a mature, actively maintained project can be slow, and still reasonable. But looking at the ~25 issues filed over the last year, many of which are real bugs or problems, it looks like only five received any response at all from maintainers - #911, #897, #862, #836, #804 - and three of those were filed by maintainers themselves.
Does use of this library essentially rule out use of async clients from the other python cloud client libraries? #289 was closed as wont-fix citing backwards compatibility concerns, but I wonder if this is outweighed by the possibility that using it could create its own kind of legacy lock-in situation.
App Engine, the datastore, and ndb are all near and dear to my heart. I've used them for up to 18 years now. (No joke.) If I'm being obnoxious here, I'm doing it out of love, and because I want to responsibly maintain the projects I build and run on the datastore.
I really, really hope I can continue to rely on ndb like I have for so long! I really, really hope I don't need to go to the massive effort of migrating all of my projects and services to the datastore client. I'd like to hear something - anything! - from the ndb maintainers and Google about the status of this (GA!) project that's part of a service I pay a nontrivial amount for every month.
Hi all! Reposting #765 (comment) here as a new issue. Hope you all don't mind.
Some work on this project is clearly happening, primarily by @rwhogg. Great, thank you! We really do appreciate it.
It's not a lot, though. Details below.
I don't mean to be ungrateful. ndb is awesome, many of us have obviously used and benefited it for decades (!) now. Thank you! However, for those of us still actively building and maintaining our own projects on ndb, it's important for us to understand the maintainers' (ie Google's) level of ongoing commitment and investment here.
Will this project eventually be sunsetted? Will it continue on with minimal support? Or is there a path toward you all engaging more actively here? Any answer is ok! But if we want a datastore client library that's more actively maintained, do we need to start planning to eventually migrate to the official datastore client, or another library?
Thanks in advance.
--
Looking at recent PRs, the vast majority are administrative or chores: docs, tests, dependencies, other minor refactorings and cleanups. Which are good! But of the ~100 PRs over the last year, it looks like just five are actual bug fixes or otherwise noticeable code changes: #882, #877, #873, #852, #815.
That may be OK. Development on a mature, actively maintained project can be slow, and still reasonable. But looking at the ~25 issues filed over the last year, many of which are real bugs or problems, it looks like only five received any response at all from maintainers - #911, #897, #862, #836, #804 - and three of those were filed by maintainers themselves.
Previously: #816, #765 etc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: