-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[3.x] Backport "Add finished
signal to GPUParticles"
#81559
[3.x] Backport "Add finished
signal to GPUParticles"
#81559
Conversation
finished
signal to GPUParticles" to 3.xfinished
signal to GPUParticles"
Should have a co-authorship as it's mostly rearranging code, add the following to your commit message:
|
d9f1f31
to
48e516b
Compare
Added coauthorship |
My bad there needs to be an empty line before the co-author message on the commit message:
|
Co-authored-by: HolonProduction <[email protected]>
48e516b
to
2a319ab
Compare
Added |
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ | |||
<return type="Rect2" /> | |||
<description> | |||
Returns a rectangle containing the positions of all existing particles. | |||
[b]Note:[/b] When using threaded rendering this method synchronizes the rendering thread. Calling it often may have a negative impact on performance. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if this applies to 3.x as well but it does make sense in theory.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Class reference-side is fine. The feature is just plain nice to have.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can be made a lot more efficient, but can be done in later PR. Perfection is the enemy of good enough, and all that. 😁
Thanks! |
Backporting #76859 to 3.x
I moved the changes over by hand instead of cherry picking in git becuase there was significant enough changes in file names and code names that it was easier to do by hand. There was some structural differences; namely using
VS
instead ofRS
in 3.x and_notification
being if statements instead of a switch in 3.x. I am fairly confident the changes in_notification
should be semantically the same as the original change but I am not familiar with the difference betweenRS
andVS
.Related to issue #64094