Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cherry pick containerless functions #3857

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 24, 2022

Conversation

jag-j
Copy link
Contributor

@jag-j jag-j commented Feb 24, 2022

What does this PR do?

Picking containerless functions PRs to release branch - #3838 and #3856.

gbockus-sf and others added 2 commits February 23, 2022 16:50
* feat: package update and wiring for containerless funcs

* feat: add flow for containerless func start

* feat: changes from self review

* feat: add copyright to all the new files

* feat: add unit test for ForceFunctionContainerStartExecutor

* feat: lint fixes

* feat: add ForceFunctionContainerlessStartExecutor unit tests

* fix: changes from review

* fix: update FunctionService unit test

* fix: unit test fixes

* fix: fix start comment integration test

* fix: add log for error that occurs on local function start

* fix: changes from review

* fix: allow debugging local java functions
* Updated Functions Overview

Updated documentation to include --
1.SFDX: Start Function in Container
2. Typescript support.

* Update docs/_articles/en/functions/overview.md

Co-authored-by: Emily Kapner <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Emily Kapner <[email protected]>
@jag-j jag-j requested review from a team as code owners February 24, 2022 00:54
@jag-j jag-j requested a review from mohanraj-r February 24, 2022 00:54
Copy link
Contributor

@gbockus-sf gbockus-sf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚢

@jag-j jag-j merged commit bc315df into release/v54.2.0 Feb 24, 2022
@jag-j jag-j deleted the jj/cherrypick_containerless_function branch February 24, 2022 17:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants