feat: add venice style presets & option to remove watermark (image generation) #1410
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
adds the ability to use venice's style presets as well as choose to remove the default watermark
monilpat
approved these changes
Dec 23, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Relates to:
Super simple PR to add the option to use venice's style presets on image generation as well as the ability to remove the default watermark. (Also added in seed field which I guess I missed)
Risks
As low as it gets!
Background
What does this PR do?
adds the option to use venice's style presets on image generation as well as the ability to remove the default watermark.
What kind of change is this?
Features (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
Documentation changes needed?
No, I guess we could add details about using venices image generation system but I don't think we have provider specific details in docs currently.
Testing
Where should a reviewer start?
Add the new options to character file and generate an image