-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
D207 and D300 doesn't mention formatter redundancy #9675
Labels
Comments
It looks like an oversight to me; thanks! |
zanieb
added
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
good first issue
Good for newcomers
labels
Jan 29, 2024
Looks like it also applies to D300. |
trag1c
changed the title
D207 doesn't mention formatter redundancy
D207 and D300 doesn't mention formatter redundancy
Jan 29, 2024
I'd like to try this issue. Could you assign me to fix this issue? |
arkuhn
added a commit
to arkuhn/ruff
that referenced
this issue
Feb 16, 2024
- Update docs to mention formatter compatability interactions for under-indentation (D207) and triple-single-quotes (D300) - Changes verified locally with mkdocs - Closes: astral-sh#9675
arkuhn
added a commit
to arkuhn/ruff
that referenced
this issue
Feb 16, 2024
- Update docs to mention formatter compatability interactions for under-indentation (D207) and triple-single-quotes (D300) - Changes verified locally with mkdocs - Closes: astral-sh#9675
charliermarsh
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 17, 2024
- Update docs to mention formatter compatibility interactions for under-indentation (D207) and triple-single-quotes (D300) - Changes verified locally with mkdocs - Closes: #9675
nkxxll
pushed a commit
to nkxxll/ruff
that referenced
this issue
Mar 10, 2024
) - Update docs to mention formatter compatibility interactions for under-indentation (D207) and triple-single-quotes (D300) - Changes verified locally with mkdocs - Closes: astral-sh#9675
Are you sure D300 applies? The playground even with |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Both D207 and D208 seem to be affected by the formatter, yet only D208 documents that behavior. Are there any cases in which D208 violations won't get formatted correctly or is this just an oversight?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: