Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add EPANET MSX enhancements #426

Closed
wants to merge 149 commits into from
Closed

Add EPANET MSX enhancements #426

wants to merge 149 commits into from

Conversation

dbhart
Copy link
Collaborator

@dbhart dbhart commented May 20, 2024

This provides updates to WNTR that integrate EPANET-MSX into the EpanetSimulator.

In addition to the new simulation options, this provides MSX model objects, such as species, terms, etc., that can be added to a water network model in a similar way to how WNTR works currently.

Demonstration is located in examples/demos/

dbhart and others added 30 commits August 17, 2023 14:37
The class will be similar to the WaterNetworkModel in terms of its
structure and options.
Merge main into development branch
Update to add basic citation class
* Update to exception documentation

* Update documentation for EN errors
@dbhart
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dbhart commented Dec 16, 2024

Please pull in #451 first, as it was pulled into this PR in order to get the GIS functionality to work properly.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 16, 2024

Coverage Status

coverage: 81.863% (-2.5%) from 84.341%
when pulling f99ad1d on dbhart:msx
into 0badb0b on USEPA:main.

@dbhart dbhart force-pushed the msx branch 2 times, most recently from 579508d to f99ad1d Compare December 16, 2024 18:52
@dbhart dbhart closed this Dec 16, 2024
@dbhart dbhart deleted the msx branch December 16, 2024 18:59
@dbhart dbhart restored the msx branch December 16, 2024 19:00
@dbhart
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dbhart commented Dec 17, 2024

Please see #462, as this PR got closed trying to revert an inadvertent addition that should have had its own PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants