Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v8.4.0 #13017

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 8, 2021
Merged

v8.4.0 #13017

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 8, 2021

Conversation

connorjclark
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@connorjclark connorjclark requested a review from a team as a code owner September 7, 2021 23:43
@connorjclark connorjclark requested review from patrickhulce and removed request for a team September 7, 2021 23:43
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Sep 7, 2021
changelog.md Outdated
Comment on lines 51 to 55
* flow: sidebar mocks ([#13002](https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/pull/13002))
* flow: embedded lighthouse report ([#12989](https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/pull/12989))
* flow: summary page ([#12973](https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/pull/12973))
* flow: navigation sidebar ([#12929](https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/pull/12929))
* flow: standalone shell report with preact ([#12850](https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/pull/12850))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could put these under fraggle rock

Copy link
Collaborator

@patrickhulce patrickhulce left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like moving the flow report to FR section though 👍

Copy link
Member

@brendankenny brendankenny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry, one last thing

changelog.md Outdated
Comment on lines 52 to 53
* isolate type checking ([#12953](https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/pull/12953), [#12952](https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/pull/12952), [#12951](https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/pull/12951))
* extract independent types ([#12946](https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/pull/12946), [#12940](https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/pull/12940))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a lot of these aren't the report, maybe combine these (and #12914 under "Core") and make it "restructure types to use project references" (or something like that) and move to core or misc?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants