Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create :revisable flag for compatibility with Revise #35

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

Tortar
Copy link
Contributor

@Tortar Tortar commented Feb 11, 2024

Fixes #13

The example provided by @Eben60 works with revisableproto, as well as all tests except for the docstring one. For this reason, I created this new version.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (df875e2) 97.50% compared to head (27c2de2) 96.89%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files Patch % Lines
src/ProtoStruct.jl 90.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #35      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.50%   96.89%   -0.61%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         120      129       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits          117      125       +8     
- Misses          3        4       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Tortar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tortar commented Feb 11, 2024

I'm not sure this can work with docstring attachments easily, in the future we can deprecate this new version if we find a way to fix it

@Tortar Tortar changed the title Create revisableproto macro for compatibility with Revise Create :revisable flag for compatibility with Revise Feb 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incompatible with using Revise
1 participant