You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Cargo.lock format is changing over time (and is practically guaranteed to continue changing) and the most recent change has brought up ideas again about possibly encoding a version number into Cargo.lock. There's a number of comments on that thread weighing some pros and cons (including this one).
One possible way to implement this would be to add a field to the [metadata] table. Every version of Cargo ever preserves the [metadata] table, and so we can add a version number in there practically any time and have it preserved by older Cargo while recognized by newer Cargo.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The
Cargo.lock
format is changing over time (and is practically guaranteed to continue changing) and the most recent change has brought up ideas again about possibly encoding a version number intoCargo.lock
. There's a number of comments on that thread weighing some pros and cons (including this one).One possible way to implement this would be to add a field to the
[metadata]
table. Every version of Cargo ever preserves the[metadata]
table, and so we can add a version number in there practically any time and have it preserved by older Cargo while recognized by newer Cargo.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: