Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should perl.com/index.xml be deprecated, or maybe redirect? #320

Open
codingthat opened this issue Feb 17, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Should perl.com/index.xml be deprecated, or maybe redirect? #320

codingthat opened this issue Feb 17, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
general: question A question that doesn't fit in anywhere else hugo: templates

Comments

@codingthat
Copy link

codingthat commented Feb 17, 2021

I'm not sure if perl.com used to link to /index.xml at one point, but somehow that's what I had subscribed to, until recently I noticed that wasn't very useful, because the main action is at /article/index.xml. Maybe the former should be removed? If not, there are a number of <item>s with date issues:

image

@codingthat
Copy link
Author

I guess this changed with #268 .

@codingthat
Copy link
Author

I see this is probably generated for both locations (and others?) by the same file, https://github.com/tpf/perldotcom/blob/master/layouts/_default/rss.xml

@codingthat codingthat changed the title Deprecated XML? Should perl.com/index.xml be deprecated, or maybe redirect? Feb 17, 2021
@briandfoy briandfoy added general: question A question that doesn't fit in anywhere else hugo: templates labels Feb 25, 2021
@briandfoy
Copy link
Contributor

I see this issue, but there are several things ahead of it that we're focussing on right now. I'm not against removing the top level index.xml, but we also need to look at traffic to see how it's being used.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
general: question A question that doesn't fit in anywhere else hugo: templates
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants