test: improve fs.exists coverage

By adding a test case using a path with illegal protocol PR-URL: #14301 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
nodejs · Jul 24, 2017 · 99104e1 · 99104e1
1 parent e54f75b
commit 99104e1
Showing 1 changed file with 5 additions and 0 deletions.
diff --git a/test/parallel/test-fs-exists.js b/test/parallel/test-fs-exists.js
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 const common = require('../common');
 const assert = require('assert');
 const fs = require('fs');
+const { URL } = require('url');
 const f = __filename;
 
 fs.exists(f, common.mustCall(function(y) {
@@ -33,5 +34,9 @@ fs.exists(`${f}-NO`, common.mustCall(function(y) {
   assert.strictEqual(y, false);
 }));
 
+fs.exists(new URL('https://foo'), common.mustCall(function(y) {
+  assert.strictEqual(y, false);
+}));
+
 assert(fs.existsSync(f));
 assert(!fs.existsSync(`${f}-NO`));