Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Has anyone re-experimented feature extraction from the raw video? #14

Open
bugczw opened this issue Jul 26, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Has anyone re-experimented feature extraction from the raw video? #14

bugczw opened this issue Jul 26, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@bugczw
Copy link

bugczw commented Jul 26, 2021

As I have say in #12 , when I re-extract the features to train the network, the f1 score of the model is only about 0.3. Is this normal? Has anyone re-experimented feature extraction from the raw video?

@Lvqin001
Copy link

Lvqin001 commented Apr 2, 2022

As I have say in #12 , when I re-extract the features to train the network, the f1 score of the model is only about 0.3. Is this normal? Has anyone re-experimented feature extraction from the raw video?

Have you solved this problem? In my other two experiments(https://github.com/StevRamos/video_summarization;https://github.com/e-apostolidis/PGL-SUM), the effect of using the features extracted by myself is very poor. Even if you train yourself, the effect is not good. Later, it was found that it was not the characteristic problem, but that the same gtscore and change_points could not be obtained. I use gtscore and change_points in h5, as well as the googlenet features extracted by myself, to achieve the effect. But you will find that even if you use the feature of all zeros and gtscore and change_points in h5, you can get better results.

@habib1402
Copy link

As I have say in #12 , when I re-extract the features to train the network, the f1 score of the model is only about 0.3. Is this normal? Has anyone re-experimented feature extraction from the raw video?

Have you solved this problem? In my other two experiments(https://github.com/StevRamos/video_summarization;https://github.com/e-apostolidis/PGL-SUM), the effect of using the features extracted by myself is very poor. Even if you train yourself, the effect is not good. Later, it was found that it was not the characteristic problem, but that the same gtscore and change_points could not be obtained. I use gtscore and change_points in h5, as well as the googlenet features extracted by myself, to achieve the effect. But you will find that even if you use the feature of all zeros and gtscore and change_points in h5, you can get better results.

Did you employ any other backbone network?

@mohammedshady
Copy link

the effect of using the features extracted by myself is very poor

have you found any solution to this problem ? if you did please let me know.
Thanks ,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants