Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: i.variance #439

Open
AndrewCunliffe opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Feature Request: i.variance #439

AndrewCunliffe opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@AndrewCunliffe
Copy link

Please consider adding support for i.variance https://grass.osgeo.org/grass-stable/manuals/addons/i.variance.html described well here. We're not aware of another implementation of this in R, and currently we're using GRASS only to implement this for analysis in a few projects.

As Woodcock and Strahler (1980) write: "The reasoning behind this measure is as follows.

  • If the spatial resolution is considerably finer than the objects in the scene, most of the measurements in the image will be highly correlated with their neighbours and a measure of local variance will be low.
  • If the objects approximate the size of the resolution cells, then the likelihood of neighbours being similar decreases and the local variance rises.
  • As the size of the resolution cells increase and many objects are found in a single resolution cell, the local variance decreases."

We think that this i.variance metric (and specifically the variance/resolution plots) might be more nuanced and informative than the (semi)variograms that are often used to characterise and understand spatial structure in the biophysical environment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant