Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

project README contains no clear purpose, intent, or target goals #24

Open
Osndok opened this issue Aug 7, 2017 · 6 comments
Open

project README contains no clear purpose, intent, or target goals #24

Osndok opened this issue Aug 7, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@Osndok
Copy link

Osndok commented Aug 7, 2017

e.g.

  • "aim to improve speed of [encode|decode]"
  • "to see if we can improve the quality [per byte of]"
  • "thought it would be fun to..."
  • etc.
@jyrkialakuijala
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for asking! We will give an attempt to fix this soon.

@Noctem
Copy link

Noctem commented Aug 8, 2017

The readme also mentions "Brunsli (lossless JPEG repacker)", but I've searched and been unable to find that anywhere. Is it publicly available?

@jyrkialakuijala
Copy link
Collaborator

jyrkialakuijala commented Aug 8, 2017

Brunsli is a not-yet-opensourced project, similar to Dropbox's Lepton but just another point on the density/speed curve: 2.5x as fast but 2 % worse in compression. I'd rather put effort in polishing Pik than launching Brunsli at this stage. Consider using Lepton for now?

@Noctem
Copy link

Noctem commented Aug 8, 2017

@jyrkialakuijala It might be worth mentioning that in the readme until it's released to avoid confusion.

And does Brunsli create valid JPEGs or its own file format like Lepton? I'm currently using mozjpeg so that I can use the images without any intermediate steps.

@jyrkialakuijala
Copy link
Collaborator

Brunsli is its own incompatible format. Our project that creates valid jpegs is called Guetzli, located at https://github.com/google/guetzli

@Noctem
Copy link

Noctem commented Aug 10, 2017

Okay, thanks for the info. Unfortunately I'm usually looking to losslessly compress JPEGs, and my understanding is that guetzli is lossy only. Sounds like mozjpeg is likely still the best for my needs.

Sorry for derailing the subject of this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants