-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Discuss the influence AccessFacilities (from SIRI) in the OJP query and reply #194
Comments
Stefan: SituationExchange stuff. The why (because escalator is broken is the interesting part). We should be able to show in the Transferleg that the Accessibility is broken. I always have first the static planning and then should be able to give the why. Stefan: What would ideal trip reply do. Stefan will provide a some concept. Work with André |
André: I will create a PR with my proposal. |
This issue is followed up by PR#235 and can be closed. I don't seem to have the right permissions to do it. |
See PR #238 for indicating status information of access facilities. If the solution proposed there is sufficient then this issue can be closed. |
The accessfacilities include information concerning station information for example. We must discuss the influence of SIRI in the OJP query and reply structures. For example step free when the escalator is broken.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: